Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27893820›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

Azithromycin vs. Placebo for the Clinical Outcome in Campylobacter concisus Diarrhoea in Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Hans Linde Nielsen, Karina Frahm Kirk, Jacob Bodilsen, Tove Ejlertsen, Henrik Nielsen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01531218 (Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Of Azithromycin In Campylobacter Concisus Positive Patients With Diarrhea), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01531218 phase3completednot on this map

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Of Azithromycin In Campylobacter Concisus Positive Patients With Diarrhea

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2012 to 2013Enrolled100ConditionsDiarrhea, Fever, Vomiting, Abdominal PainArmsazithromycin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Pharmacokinetics of Tulathromycin Following Subcutaneous Administration in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hans Linde NielsenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Karina Frahm KirkDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jacob BodilsenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Tove EjlertsenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Henrik NielsenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aalborg University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Campylobacter concisus has been associated with prolonged mild diarrhoea, but investigations regarding the efficacy of antimicrobial treatment have not been reported previously. We initiated a phase 3, single-centre, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy of 500 mg once-daily dose of azithromycin with a 500 mg once-daily dose of placebo for three days, for the treatment of C. concisus diarrhoea in adult patients with a follow-up period of ten days. If symptoms persisted at day ten, the patient was offered cross-over study treatment of three days and another ten-day follow-up period. The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical response, defined as time to cessation of diarrhoea (<3 stools/day or reversal of accompanying symptoms). Our estimated sample size was 100 patients. We investigated a total of 10,036 diarrheic stool samples from 7,089 adult patients. Five-hundred and eighty-eight C. concisus positive patients were assessed for eligibility, of which 559 were excluded prior to randomization. The three main reasons for exclusion were duration of diarrhoea longer than 21 days (n = 124), previous antibiotic treatment (n = 113), and co-pathogens in stools (n = 87). Therefore, 24 patients completed the trial with either azithromycin (n = 12) or placebo (n = 12). Both groups presented symptoms of mild, prolonged diarrhoea with a mean duration of 18 days (95% CI: 16-19). One person in the azithromycin group and four from the placebo group chose to continue with crossover medication after the initial ten-day period. In the azithromycin group, there was a mean of seven days (95% CI: 5-9) to clinical cure and for the placebo group it was ten days (95% CI: 6-14) (OR-3 (95% CI: -7-1). We observed no differences in all examined outcomes between azithromycin treatment and placebo. However, due to unforeseen recruitment difficulties we did not reach our estimated sample size of 100 patients and statistical power to conclude on an effect of azithromycin treatment was not obtained.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01531218.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinBacterial ProteinsCampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsCross-Over StudiesDiarrheaDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlacebo EffectAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27893820
PMCPMC5125586
OpenAlexW2557863945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.