ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
Extending Integrate-and-Fire Model Neurons to Account for the Effects of Weak Electric Fields and Input Filtering Mediated by the Dendrite.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Encoding performance of cortical neurons critically depends on their morphological and neurophysiological properties.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Intensity-dependent tACS entrainment effects in a cortical microcircuit: a computational study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predicting neural responses to intra- and extra-cranial electric brain stimulation by means of the reciprocity theorem.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Effects of dendritic CaJournal of computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Dynamic Gain Decomposition Reveals Functional Effects of Dendrites, Ion Channels, and Input Statistics in Population Coding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Intensity- and frequency-specific effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation are explained by network dynamics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Neurocognitive, physiological, and biophysical effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023Review
- Directional sensitivity of cortical neurons towards TMS-induced electric fields.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on spiking activity in computational models of single neocortical neurons.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Ultrafast population coding and axo-somatic compartmentalization.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Illuminating dendritic function with computational models.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2020Review
- Low-rate firing limit for neurons with axon, soma and dendrites driven by spatially distributed stochastic synapses.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Biophysically grounded mean-field models of neural populations under electrical stimulation.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Weak electric fields promote resonance in neuronal spiking activity: Analytical results from two-compartment cell and network models.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Network remodeling induced by transcranial brain stimulation: A computational model of tDCS-triggered cell assembly formation.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2019Article
- Dependence and Homeostasis of Membrane Impedance on Cell Morphology in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Differential polarization of cortical pyramidal neuron dendrites through weak extracellular fields.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcranial brain stimulation and evidence of ephaptic coupling have recently sparked strong interests in understanding the effects of weak electric fields on the dynamics of brain networks and of coupled populations of neurons. The collective dynamics of large neuronal populations can be efficiently studied using single-compartment (point) model neurons of the integrate-and-fire (IF) type as their elements. These models, however, lack the dendritic morphology required to biophysically describe the effect of an extracellular electric field on the neuronal membrane voltage. Here, we extend the IF point neuron models to accurately reflect morphology dependent electric field effects extracted from a canonical spatial "ball-and-stick" (BS) neuron model. Even in the absence of an extracellular field, neuronal morphology by itself strongly affects the cellular response properties. We, therefore, derive additional components for leaky and nonlinear IF neuron models to reproduce the subthreshold voltage and spiking dynamics of the BS model exposed to both fluctuating somatic and dendritic inputs and an extracellular electric field. We show that an oscillatory electric field causes spike rate resonance, or equivalently, pronounced spike to field coherence. Its resonance frequency depends on the location of the synaptic background inputs. For somatic inputs the resonance appears in the beta and gamma frequency range, whereas for distal dendritic inputs it is shifted to even higher frequencies. Irrespective of an external electric field, the presence of a dendritic cable attenuates the subthreshold response at the soma to slowly-varying somatic inputs while implementing a low-pass filter for distal dendritic inputs. Our point neuron model extension is straightforward to implement and is computationally much more efficient compared to the original BS model. It is well suited for studying the dynamics of large populations of neurons with heterogeneous dendritic morphology with (and without) the influence of weak external electric fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.