Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27893779›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Rapid Recovery of Visual Function Associated with Blue Cone Ablation in Zebrafish.

Gordon F Hagerman, Nicole C L Noel, Sylvia Y Cao, Michèle G DuVal, A Phillip Oel, W Ted Allison

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Retina regeneration: lessons from vertebrates.Oxford open neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Metabolism in the Zebrafish Retina.Journal of developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Reprogramming Müller Glia to Regenerate Retinal Neurons.Annual review of vision science · 2020
    Review
  19. Noninvasive Imaging of Cone Ablation and Regeneration in Zebrafish.Translational vision science & technology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gordon F HagermanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton Alberta, Canada.
Nicole C L NoelDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton Alberta, Canada.
Sylvia Y CaoDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton Alberta, Canada.
Michèle G DuValDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton Alberta, Canada.
A Phillip OelDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton Alberta, Canada.
W Ted AllisonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton Alberta, Canada.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hurdles in the treatment of retinal degeneration include managing the functional rewiring of surviving photoreceptors and integration of any newly added cells into the remaining second-order retinal neurons. Zebrafish are the premier genetic model for such questions, and we present two new transgenic lines allowing us to contrast vision loss and recovery following conditional ablation of specific cone types: UV or blue cones. The ablation of each cone type proved to be thorough (killing 80% of cells in each intended cone class), specific, and cell-autonomous. We assessed the loss and recovery of vision in larvae via the optomotor behavioural response (OMR). This visually mediated behaviour decreased to about 5% or 20% of control levels following ablation of UV or blue cones, respectively (P<0.05). We further assessed ocular photoreception by measuring the effects of UV light on body pigmentation, and observed that photoreceptor deficits and recovery occurred (p<0.01) with a timeline coincident to the OMR results. This corroborated and extended previous conclusions that UV cones are required photoreceptors for modulating body pigmentation, addressing assumptions that were unavoidable in previous experiments. Functional vision recovery following UV cone ablation was robust, as measured by both assays, returning to control levels within four days. In contrast, robust functional recovery following blue cone ablation was unexpectedly rapid, returning to normal levels within 24 hours after ablation. Ablation of cones led to increased proliferation in the retina, though the rapid recovery of vision following blue cone ablation was demonstrated to not be mediated by blue cone regeneration. Thus rapid visual recovery occurs following ablation of some, but not all, cone subtypes, suggesting an opportunity to contrast and dissect the sources and mechanisms of outer retinal recovery during cone photoreceptor death and regeneration.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCell DeathCell ProliferationLarvaMelaninsMetronidazoleNitroreductasesPigmentationRetinaRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal DegenerationUltraviolet RaysVision, OcularZebrafishMelaninsMetronidazoleNitroreductases

Identifiers

PMID27893779
PMCPMC5125653
OpenAlexW2558661593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.