Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27893698›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2016

Influence of Acoustic Overstimulation on the Central Auditory System: An Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Study.

Tomasz Wolak, Katarzyna Cieśla, Mateusz Rusiniak, Adam Piłka, Monika Lewandowska, Agnieszka Pluta, Henryk Skarżyński, Piotr H Skarżyński

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hearing loss and dementia: radiologic and biomolecular basis of their shared characteristics. A systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Hearing Loss and Alzheimer Disease.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomasz WolakInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland.
Katarzyna CieślaInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland.
Mateusz RusiniakInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland.
Adam PiłkaInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland.
Monika LewandowskaInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland.
Agnieszka PlutaInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland.
Henryk SkarżyńskiInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland.
Piotr H SkarżyńskiInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland.
Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The goal of the fMRI experiment was to explore the involvement of central auditory structures in pathomechanisms of a behaviorally manifested auditory temporary threshold shift in humans. MATERIAL AND METHODS The material included 18 healthy volunteers with normal hearing. Subjects in the exposure group were presented with 15 min of binaural acoustic overstimulation of narrowband noise (3 kHz central frequency) at 95 dB(A). The control group was not exposed to noise but instead relaxed in silence. Auditory fMRI was performed in 1 session before and 3 sessions after acoustic overstimulation and involved 3.5-4.5 kHz sweeps. RESULTS The outcomes of the study indicate a possible effect of acoustic overstimulation on central processing, with decreased brain responses to auditory stimulation up to 20 min after exposure to noise. The effect can be seen already in the primary auditory cortex. Decreased BOLD signal change can be due to increased excitation thresholds and/or increased spontaneous activity of auditory neurons throughout the auditory system. CONCLUSIONS The trial shows that fMRI can be a valuable tool in acoustic overstimulation studies but has to be used with caution and considered complimentary to audiological measures. Further methodological improvements are needed to distinguish the effects of TTS and neuronal habituation to repetitive stimulation.

Indexed as

AcousticsAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory CortexAuditory FatigueAuditory ThresholdEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNoiseYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27893698
PMCPMC5132427
OpenAlexW2558949966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.