Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27893695›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2016

Clinical assessment tests in evaluating patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional study.

Ming-Lung Chuang, I-Feng Lin, Chai-Yuan Lee

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Validity and Reliability of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) for Family Caregivers of Children with Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Nitrogen single-breath washout test for evaluating exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2018
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. COPD assessment test and FEVInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ming-Lung ChuangDivision of Pulmonary Medicine and Departments of Internal Medicine and Critical Care Medicine School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung Institute and Department of Public Health, National Yang Ming University, Taipei Department of Nursing, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
I-Feng Lin
Chai-Yuan Lee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exertional dyspnea scales (EDS) and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires (HRQoLQs) are used to assess chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The GOLD guidelines categorize patients according to either 1 of these 2 domains, the lung function and the frequency of acute exacerbations in the preceding year, however with inconsistent results. Combining EDS and HRQoLQs may yield better results; however, the best combination is unclear. Whether the EDS quantifies the exercise capacity or the dyspnea perception is also unclear. The study was designed to correlate the EDS with exercise capacity and dyspnea perception and to evaluate the best combination of the EDS and HRQoLQ.Three EDS were compared by exercise capacity and Borg scores at rest and during exercise in 57 patients with COPD. Three HRQoLQs were compared by 4 domains of clinical assessments, and 2 types of exercise. The strength of correlation |r| was categorized by quartiles from <0.3 to ≥0.6.The EDS was better correlated with exercise capacities (|r| = 0.29-0.65, P < 0.05-<0.0001) than with the resting and exertional Borg scores (|r| = 0.08-0.55, P = NS- <0.0001). The EDS were moderately to strongly interrelated, but this correlation was weaker when including Oxygen-cost Diagram (OCD) (with the modified Medical Research Council, mMRC r = -0.56, with the baseline dyspnea index, BDI r = 0.49 vs. mMRC with BDI r = -0.73); however, the OCD had the strongest correlation with walking distance (r = 0.65, vs mMRC r = -0.59, BDI r = 0.5) and peak oxygen uptake (r = 0.39 vs mMRC r = -0.29, BDI r = 0.36). Among the HRQoLQs, the COPD assessment test (CAT) was most strongly correlated with the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (r = 0.77) and similar to the SGRQ regarding significant correlations with the other instruments (|r| = 0.29-0.67 vs. 0.36-0.77) but poorly with walking distance (r = -0.02). The OCD was mildly correlated with the CAT (r = -0.4).The EDS was more related to the exercise capacity than to the dyspnea perception and the CAT was most closely related to the other instruments but poorly with walking distance. The OCD can be used to compensate for this weak correlation. The study suggests using the CAT and the OCD simultaneously when undertaking clinical evaluation of patients with COPD.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDyspneaExercise ToleranceFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID27893695
PMCPMC5134888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.