Observational studyMedicine2016
Clinical assessment tests in evaluating patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Hierarchical stratification of the factors related to exertional dyspnoea and exercise intolerance in male COPD patients.Annals of medicine · 2022Article
- The Impact of Oxygen Pulse and Its Curve Patterns on Male Patients with Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Healthy Controls-Ejection Fractions, Related Factors and Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Validity and Reliability of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) for Family Caregivers of Children with Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Mechanisms affecting exercise ventilatory inefficiency-airflow obstruction relationship in male patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Respiratory research · 2020Observational
- Combining Dynamic Hyperinflation with Dead Space Volume during Maximal Exercise in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Observational
- Nitrogen single-breath washout test for evaluating exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2018Article
- Association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hemorrhoids: A nationwide cohort study.Medicine · 2017Observational
- Alteration of the irisin-brain-derived neurotrophic factor axis contributes to disturbance of mood in COPD patients.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2017Article
- COPD assessment test and FEVInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exertional dyspnea scales (EDS) and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires (HRQoLQs) are used to assess chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The GOLD guidelines categorize patients according to either 1 of these 2 domains, the lung function and the frequency of acute exacerbations in the preceding year, however with inconsistent results. Combining EDS and HRQoLQs may yield better results; however, the best combination is unclear. Whether the EDS quantifies the exercise capacity or the dyspnea perception is also unclear. The study was designed to correlate the EDS with exercise capacity and dyspnea perception and to evaluate the best combination of the EDS and HRQoLQ.Three EDS were compared by exercise capacity and Borg scores at rest and during exercise in 57 patients with COPD. Three HRQoLQs were compared by 4 domains of clinical assessments, and 2 types of exercise. The strength of correlation |r| was categorized by quartiles from <0.3 to ≥0.6.The EDS was better correlated with exercise capacities (|r| = 0.29-0.65, P < 0.05-<0.0001) than with the resting and exertional Borg scores (|r| = 0.08-0.55, P = NS- <0.0001). The EDS were moderately to strongly interrelated, but this correlation was weaker when including Oxygen-cost Diagram (OCD) (with the modified Medical Research Council, mMRC r = -0.56, with the baseline dyspnea index, BDI r = 0.49 vs. mMRC with BDI r = -0.73); however, the OCD had the strongest correlation with walking distance (r = 0.65, vs mMRC r = -0.59, BDI r = 0.5) and peak oxygen uptake (r = 0.39 vs mMRC r = -0.29, BDI r = 0.36). Among the HRQoLQs, the COPD assessment test (CAT) was most strongly correlated with the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (r = 0.77) and similar to the SGRQ regarding significant correlations with the other instruments (|r| = 0.29-0.67 vs. 0.36-0.77) but poorly with walking distance (r = -0.02). The OCD was mildly correlated with the CAT (r = -0.4).The EDS was more related to the exercise capacity than to the dyspnea perception and the CAT was most closely related to the other instruments but poorly with walking distance. The OCD can be used to compensate for this weak correlation. The study suggests using the CAT and the OCD simultaneously when undertaking clinical evaluation of patients with COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.