Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27893044›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2017

Failure of the Porcine Ascending Aorta: Multidirectional Experiments and a Unifying Microstructural Model.

Colleen M Witzenburg, Rohit Y Dhume, Sachin B Shah, Christopher E Korenczuk, Hallie P Wagner, Patrick W Alford, Victor H Barocas

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bio-chemo-mechanics of the thoracic aorta.Vascular biology (Bristol, England) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colleen M WitzenburgDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Rohit Y DhumeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Sachin B ShahDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Christopher E KorenczukDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Hallie P WagnerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Patrick W AlfordDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Victor H BarocasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, 7-105 Nils Hasselmo Hall, 312 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 e-mail: baroc001@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Multiscale Mechanics of Bioengineered TissueR01EB005813 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI BAROCAS, VICTOR H · 2005 to 2017
$4.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ascending thoracic aorta is poorly understood mechanically, especially its risk of dissection. To make better predictions of dissection risk, more information about the multidimensional failure behavior of the tissue is needed, and this information must be incorporated into an appropriate theoretical/computational model. Toward the creation of such a model, uniaxial, equibiaxial, peel, and shear lap tests were performed on healthy porcine ascending aorta samples. Uniaxial and equibiaxial tests showed anisotropy with greater stiffness and strength in the circumferential direction. Shear lap tests showed catastrophic failure at shear stresses (150-200 kPa) much lower than uniaxial tests (750-2500 kPa), consistent with the low peel tension (∼60 mN/mm). A novel multiscale computational model, including both prefailure and failure mechanics of the aorta, was developed. The microstructural part of the model included contributions from a collagen-reinforced elastin sheet and interlamellar connections representing fibrillin and smooth muscle. Components were represented as nonlinear fibers that failed at a critical stretch. Multiscale simulations of the different experiments were performed, and the model, appropriately specified, agreed well with all experimental data, representing a uniquely complete structure-based description of aorta mechanics. In addition, our experiments and model demonstrate the very low strength of the aorta in radial shear, suggesting an important possible mechanism for aortic dissection.

Indexed as

Aorta, ThoracicMechanical PhenomenaModels, BiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaMaleMaterials TestingStress, MechanicalSwine

Identifiers

PMID27893044
PMCPMC5395918
OpenAlexW2555558129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.