ArticleThe Journal of physiology2017
Cortical and reticular contributions to human precision and power grip.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Novel Wearable Device for Motor Recovery of Hand Function in Chronic Stroke Survivors.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2020Trial
- Superficial Ventral Premotor Pathways to Primary Motor Cortex Shape the Temporal Coordination of Precision Graspinnog.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Extent of damage to descending output from cortex rather than to specific cortical regions drives the emergence of flexor synergy in non-human primates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Corticospinal, reticulospinal and motoneuronal contributions to fatigability during a sustained contraction of the elbow flexors.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Age-related changes in hand function - it's not just about muscle strength.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Manual dexterity among older adults with and without sarcopenia.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- Enhanced inhibitory input to triceps brachii in humans with spinal cord injury.The Journal of physiology · 2024Article
- Age-related changes in reticulospinal contributions to anticipatory postural adjustments between back extensors and abdominal muscles.Experimental physiology · 2024Article
- Evolution, biomechanics, and neurobiology converge to explain selective finger motor control.Physiological reviews · 2024Review
- A Reflection on Motor Overflow, Mirror Phenomena, Synkinesia and Entrainment.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2023Review
- Identifying the role of the reticulospinal tract for strength and motor recovery: A scoping review of nonhuman and human studies.Physiological reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Pairing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Loud Sounds Produces Plastic Changes in Motor Output.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- The Existence of the StartReact Effect Implies Reticulospinal, Not Corticospinal, Inputs Dominate Drive to Motoneurons during Voluntary Movement.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Startling stimuli increase maximal motor unit discharge rate and rate of force development in humans.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Does the reticulospinal tract mediate adaptation to resistance training in humans?Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2022Review
- Motor inhibition and its contribution to recovery of dexterous hand use after stroke.Brain communications · 2022Article
- The strength of corticomotoneuronal drive underlies ALS split phenotypes and reflects early upper motor neuron dysfunction.Brain and behavior · 2021Review
- Plasticity in Cervical Motor Circuits following Spinal Cord Injury and Rehabilitation.Biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
key pointsThe corticospinal tract contributes to the control of finger muscles during precision and power grip. We explored the neural mechanisms contributing to changes in corticospinal excitability during these gripping configurations. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by cortical, but not by subcortical, stimulation were more suppressed during power grip compared with precision grip and index finger abduction. Intracortical inhibition was more reduced during power grip compared with the other tasks. An acoustic startle cue, a stimulus that engages the reticular system, suppressed MEP size during power grip to a lesser extent than during the other tasks at a cortical level and this positively correlated with changes in intracortical inhibition. Our findings suggest that changes in corticospinal excitability during gross more than fine finger manipulations are largely cortical in origin and that the reticular system contributed, at least in part, to these effects. ABSTRACT: It is well accepted that the corticospinal tract contributes to the control of finger muscles during precision and power grip in humans but the neural mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. Here, we examined motor evoked potentials elicited by cortical and subcortical stimulation of corticospinal axons (MEPs and CMEPs, respectively) and the activity in intracortical circuits (suppression of voluntary electromyography) and spinal motoneurons (F-waves) in an intrinsic hand muscle during index finger abduction, precision grip and power grip. We found that the size of MEPs, but not CMEPs, was more suppressed during power grip compared with precision grip and index finger abduction, suggesting a cortical origin for these effects. Notably, intracortical inhibition was more reduced during power grip compared with the other tasks. To further examine the origin of changes in intracortical inhibition we assessed the contribution of the reticular system, which projects to cortical neurons, and projects to spinal motoneurons controlling hand muscles. An acoustic startle cue, which engages the reticular system, suppressed MEP size during power grip to a lesser extent than during the other tasks and this positively correlated with changes in intracortical inhibition. A startle cue decreased intracortical inhibition, but not CMEPs, during power grip. F-waves remained unchanged across conditions. Our novel findings show that changes in corticospinal excitability present during power grip compared with fine finger manipulations are largely cortical in origin and suggest that the reticular system contributed, at least in part, to these effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.