Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27891605›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2016

Are Two Heads Better Than One or Do Too Many Cooks Spoil the Broth? The Trade-Off between Physician Division of Labor and Patient Continuity of Care for Older Adults with Complex Chronic Conditions.

Kenton J Johnston, Jason M Hockenberry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Quality Indicators for High-Need Patients: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Exploring the Intensity and Continuity of Hospital Care for Patients With Long Covid: Evidence From an English Urban Healthcare System.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. The Impact of Continuity of Care on Cervical Cancer Screening: How Visit Pattern Affects Guideline Concordance.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Continuity of Medication Management among Adults with Schizophrenia and Comorbid Cardiometabolic Conditions.Journal of pharmaceutical health services research : an official journal of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kenton J JohnstonDepartment of Health Management and Policy and Center for Outcomes Research, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO.
Jason M HockenberryDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the effects of physician division of labor and patient continuity of care (COC) on the care quality and outcomes of older adults with complex chronic conditions. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingSeven years (2006-2012) of panel data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS). STUDY

designRegression models were used to estimate the effect of the specialty-type of physicians involved in annual patient evaluation and management, as well as patient COC, on simultaneous care processes and following year outcomes. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsMultiyear cohorts of Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes and/or heart failure were retrospectively identified to create a panel of 15,389 person-year observations. PRINCIPAL

findingsInvolvement of both primary care physicians and disease-relevant specialists is associated with better compliance with process-of-care guidelines, but patients seeing disease-relevant specialists also receive more repeat cardiac imaging (p < .05). Patient COC is associated with less repeat cardiac imaging and compliance with some recommended care processes (p < .05), but the effects are small. Receiving care from a disease-relevant specialist is associated with lower rates of following year functional impairment, institutionalization in long-term care, and ambulatory care sensitive hospitalization (p < .05).

conclusionsAnnual involvement of disease-relevant specialists in the care of beneficiaries with complex chronic conditions leads to more resource use but has a beneficial effect on outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedChronic DiseaseContinuity of Patient CareDiabetes MellitusHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansInsurance Claim ReviewLong-Term CareMedicarePhysicians, Primary CareQuality of Health CareRetrospective StudiesSpecializationUnited Stateschronic diseaseolder adultsPatient continuity of carephysician division of laborspecialty care

Identifiers

PMID27891605
PMCPMC5134216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.