ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016
Why Should Viral Markers Be Mandatory in Ocular Surgeries: A Hospital Based Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Seroprevalence, risk associations, and cost analysis of screening for viral infections among patients of cataract surgery.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHepatitis B Virus (HBV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus I, II (HIV-I,II) are serious global and public health problem. Knowledge of the seroprevalence would enable early diagnosis, treatment of patients and also help in prevention of horizontal spread of infection by application of universal infection control measures.
aimTo determine the seroprevalence of HBV, HCV and HIV I, II infection in patients undergoing ocular surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective review of 560 patients who had undergone ocular surgery between Dec 2014 to June 2015 at Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Patna, India, was done. Blood samples of patients were tested for the presence of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) and anti-HCV antibodies by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) method, while HIV I, II was tested by ELISA and Western Blot as per National AIDS Control Organization (NACO), India guidelines. The number of patients with positive viral serology, age, sex ratio and nature of surgery were analysed.
resultsOut of 560 patients, 27 (4.8%) patients were found to be positive for viral serology. HBsAg was positive in 22 patients (3.92%). Out of these 14 patients (2.5%) were male while 8(1.4%) were females. Anti- HCV was positive in 3 (0.53%) patients. Out of these 2(.35%) were male and 1 (.17%) was female. HIV was positive in 2 patients (0.35%), both of whom were males.
conclusionKeeping in view the number of cases of seropositivity in our study and various studies showing the presence of these viruses in aqueous and tears, we suggest that screening for viral markers should be made mandatory before ocular surgery so that early detection and treatment of patients can be done and risk of horizontal spread is minimized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.