ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016
Differential Effects of Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback Intervention for Residual Speech Errors.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Correcting Residual Errors With Spectral, Ultrasound, and Traditional Speech Therapy: Delineation of Sensorimotor Subtypes
Correcting Residual Errors With Spectral, Ultrasound, and Traditional Speech Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparing Traditional and Biofeedback Treatment for Residual Speech Errors Via Telepractice
Visual-acoustic Intervention With Service Delivery In-person and Via Telepractice (VISIT) Non-Inferiority Trial
Randomized Trial of AI-Enhanced Maintenance Training With Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rhotic Generalization Is More Rapid in Biofeedback Than Motor-Based Treatment for Residual Speech Sound Disorder: Secondary Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Trial
- Crowdsourced Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality in People With Parkinson's Disease Before and After Intensive Voice and Articulation Therapies: Secondary Outcome of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Trial
- Comparing Biofeedback Types for Children With Residual /ɹ/ Errors in American English: A Single-Case Randomization Design.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2021Trial
- Treatment for Residual Rhotic Errors With High- and Low-Frequency Ultrasound Visual Feedback: A Single-Case Experimental Design.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2018Trial
- Protocol for visual-acoustic intervention with service delivery in-person and via telepractice (VISIT) non-inferiority trial for residual speech sound disorder.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Traditional and Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback Treatment via Telepractice for Residual Speech Sound Disorders Affecting /ɹ/: Pilot study.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2023Article
- Neural Changes in Children With Residual Speech Sound Disorder After Ultrasound Biofeedback Speech Therapy.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- A Qualitative Analysis of Clinician Perspectives of Ultrasound Biofeedback for Speech Sound Disorders.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2023Article
- Tutorial: Using Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback for Speech Sound Training.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2023Review
- Baseline Stimulability Predicts Patterns of Response to Traditional and Ultrasound Biofeedback Treatment for Residual Speech Sound Disorder.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- Telepractice Treatment of Residual Rhotic Errors Using App-Based Biofeedback: A Pilot Study.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2022Article
- Computer-assisted challenge point intervention for residual speech errors.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2021Article
- Auditory-perceptual acuity in rhotic misarticulation: baseline characteristics and treatment response.Clinical linguistics & phonetics · 2021Article
- Effects of Practice Variability on Second-Language Speech Production Training.Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) · 2021Article
- Protocol for Correcting Residual Errors with Spectral, ULtrasound, Traditional Speech therapy Randomized Controlled Trial (C-RESULTS RCT).BMC pediatrics · 2020Article
- Individual predictors of response to biofeedback training for second-language production.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Remediating Residual Rhotic Errors With Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Treatment: A Single-Case Experimental Study.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2019Article
- Can perceptual training alter the effect of visual biofeedback in speech-motor learning?The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Selecting an acoustic correlate for automated measurement of American English rhotic production in children.International journal of speech-language pathology · 2018Article
- Deriving individualised /r/ targets from the acoustics of children's non-rhotic vowels.Clinical linguistics & phonetics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that the incorporation of visual biofeedback technologies may enhance response to treatment in individuals with residual speech errors. However, there is a need for controlled research systematically comparing biofeedback versus non-biofeedback intervention approaches. This study implemented a single-subject experimental design with a crossover component to investigate the relative efficacy of visual-acoustic biofeedback and traditional articulatory treatment for residual rhotic errors. Eleven child/adolescent participants received ten sessions of visual-acoustic biofeedback and 10 sessions of traditional treatment, with the order of biofeedback and traditional phases counterbalanced across participants. Probe measures eliciting untreated rhotic words were administered in at least three sessions prior to the start of treatment (baseline), between the two treatment phases (midpoint), and after treatment ended (maintenance), as well as before and after each treatment session. Perceptual accuracy of rhotic production was assessed by outside listeners in a blinded, randomized fashion. Results were analyzed using a combination of visual inspection of treatment trajectories, individual effect sizes, and logistic mixed-effects regression. Effect sizes and visual inspection revealed that participants could be divided into categories of strong responders (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.