Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27891055›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine insights. Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders2016

Imaging Guidance Improves the Results of Viscosupplementation with HANOX-M-XL in Patients with Ankle Osteoarthritis: Results of a Clinical Survey in 50 Patients Treated in Daily Practice.

Marie Bossert, Daniel Boublil, Jean-Marc Parisaux, Ana-Maria Bozgan, Emmanuel Richelme, Thierry Conrozier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine insights. Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Conservative Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marie BossertDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, Belfort, France.
Daniel BoublilDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinique du Parc, Lyon, France.
Jean-Marc ParisauxDepartment of Sports Medicine, Institut Monégasque de Médecine du Sport, Principauté de Monaco, Monaco.
Ana-Maria BozganDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, Belfort, France.
Emmanuel RichelmeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Institut de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Sportive, Marseille, France.
Thierry ConrozierDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, Belfort, France.
Hôpital Nord · FRClinique Ambroise Paré · FRInstitute of Sports Medicine and Science · JPInternational University of Monaco · MC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this survey was to assess retrospectively the interest of performing viscosupplementation using imaging guidance in patients suffering from ankle osteoarthritis (OA). PATIENTS AND

methodsThis is a multicenter retrospective survey using a standardized questionnaire. Fifty patients suffering from ankle OA and treated, in daily clinical practice, with a single intra-articular injection of a novel viscosupplement made of a combination of a non-animal cross-linked hyaluronan and mannitol, HANOX M-XL, were included in the survey. The injection procedure (imaging or landmark guidance), demographic data, patient's self-evaluation of pain, satisfaction, treatment efficacy, and tolerability were collected. Predictive factors of both efficacy and patient's satisfaction were investigated.

resultsThe percentages of patients very satisfied/satisfied and not really satisfied/dissatisfied with the treatment were 68% and 32%, respectively. Efficacy was rated as very good, good, moderate, and poor by 38%, 30%, 12%, and 20% of the cases, respectively. Efficacy was unrelated to gender and age and was highly correlated with pain score (

conclusionThis preliminary study suggests that the use of imaging guidance significantly optimizes the success rate of ankle viscosupplementation. No safety concern was observed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

anklefluoroscopyguidancehyaluronic acidosteoarthritisultrasonographyviscosupplementation

Identifiers

PMID27891055
PMCPMC5120624
OpenAlexW2555588618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.