Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27890937›Full record

ArticleAnimal behaviour2016

Seasonal changes in neophobia and its consistency in rooks: the effect of novelty type and dominance position.

Alison L Greggor, Jolle W Jolles, Alex Thornton, Nicola S Clayton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal behaviour, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neophilia in wolves and dogs.Animal cognition · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Social dominance influences individual susceptibility to an evolutionary trap in mosquitofish.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neophobia in 10 ungulate species-a comparative approach.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Boldness traits, not dominance, predict exploratory flight range and homing behaviour in homing pigeons.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alison L GreggorDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.
Jolle W JollesDepartment of Collective Behaviour, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Konstanz, Germany.
Alex ThorntonCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, U.K.
Nicola S ClaytonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H021817/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neophobia, or the fear of novelty, may offer benefits to animals by limiting their exposure to unknown danger, but can also impose costs by preventing the exploration of potential resources. The costs and benefits of neophobia may vary throughout the year if predation pressure, resource distribution or conspecific competition changes seasonally. Despite such variation, neophobia levels are often assumed to be temporally and individually stable. Whether or not neophobia expression changes seasonally and fluctuates equally for all individuals is crucial to understanding the drivers, consequences and plasticity of novelty avoidance. We investigated seasonal differences and individual consistency in the motivation and novelty responses of a captive group of rooks,

Indexed as

dominanceindividual consistencyneophobiapredatory warinessseasonal change

Identifiers

PMID27890937
PMCPMC5113992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.