Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27890421›Full record

ArticleClinical radiology2017

Contrast-enhanced MDCT in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: correlation with histological findings and diagnostic performance in differentiation between tumour grades.

E Belousova, G Karmazanovsky, A Kriger, D Kalinin, L Mannelli, A Glotov, N Karelskaya, O Paklina, A Kaldarov

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

E BelousovaDepartment of Radiology, A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Moscow, Russia; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Postgraduate Professional Training of Physicians, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia. Electronic address: dr.elena.belousova@gmail.com.
G KarmazanovskyDepartment of Radiology, A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Moscow, Russia; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Postgraduate Professional Training of Physicians, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
A KrigerDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Moscow, Russia.
D KalininDepartment of Pathology, A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Moscow, Russia.
L MannelliDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
A GlotovDepartment of Pathology, A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Moscow, Russia.
N KarelskayaDepartment of Radiology, A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Moscow, Russia.
O PaklinaDepartment of Pathology, A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Moscow, Russia; Department of Pathology, S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia.
A KaldarovDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Moscow, Russia.
Institute of Surgery named after A. V. Vishnevskogo · RUMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSechenov University · RU

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) features of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs), which correlate with tumour histology and enable preoperative grading. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-nine patients with histologically confirmed pNET who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced MDCT were included in this study. Nineteen tumours were classified as Grade 1 (G1) and 20 as Grade 2 (G2). Histopathology slides were reviewed to assess the intratumoural microvascular density (MVD) and the amount of tumour stroma. Computed tomography (CT) image analysis included tumour size, margin delineation, calcifications, homogeneity, contrast enhancement (CE) pattern, tumour absolute and relative enhancement, presence of cystic changes, pancreatic duct dilatation, regional and distant metastases. The diagnostic ability to predict tumour grade was measured for each MDCT finding and their combinations.

resultsThe mean arterial enhancement ratio had a mean±standard deviation of 1.53±0.45 in G1 and 1.01±0.33 in G2 pNETs (p=0.0003) and correlated with intratumoural microvascular density (MVD; r=0.55, p=0.0002). Tissue stroma percentage did not correlate with imaging findings. Late CE of the tumour (the peak attenuation observed in the venous phase) was significantly associated with G2. Tumour size >20 mm, arterial enhancement ratio <1.1, and late CE showed 74.4%, 79.5%, and 74.4% accuracy, respectively, in diagnosing G2 tumours, while the accuracy of at least two of these criteria used in combination was 82%. Based on these results, a diagnostic algorithm was proposed, which showed high interobserver agreement (k=0.82) in the prediction of tumour grade.

conclusionContrast-enhanced MDCT features correlate with histological findings and enable the differentiation between G1 and G2 pNETs during preoperative examination.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansIodineMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyNeoplasm GradingNeuroendocrine TumorsObserver VariationPancreatic NeoplasmsRadiographic Image EnhancementReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityStatistics as TopicContrast MediaIodine

Identifiers

PMID27890421
PMCPMC5552195
OpenAlexW2552046950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.