Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27889526›Full record

ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2017

Strain shielding in trabecular bone at the tibial cement-bone interface.

Priyanka Srinivasan, Mark A Miller, Nico Verdonschot, Kenneth A Mann, Dennis Janssen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Computational tibial bone remodeling over a population after total knee arthroplasty: A comparative study.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Trabecular resorption patterns of cement-bone interlock regions in total knee replacements.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Priyanka SrinivasanOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: priyanka.srinivasan@radboudumc.nl.
Mark A MillerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Upstate Medical University, 3216 IHP, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Nico VerdonschotOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; University of Twente, Laboratory for Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Kenneth A MannDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Upstate Medical University, 3216 IHP, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Dennis JanssenOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

INTERFACE FAILURE IN TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENTSR01AR042017 · NIAMS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI MANN, KENNETH A. · 2001 to 2021
$6.3M
INTERFACE FAILURE IN TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENTSR29AR042017 · NIAMS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI MANN, KENNETH A. · 1996 to 2000
$68k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR042017NIAMS NIH HHS R29 AR042017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aseptic loosening of the tibial component remains the leading cause for revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Understanding the mechanisms leading to loss of fixation can offer insight into preventative measures to ensure a longer survival rate. In cemented TKA, loosening occurs at the cement-trabecular interface probably due to a stress-shielding effect of the stiffer implant material in comparison with bone. Using finite element models of lab-prepared tibial cement-trabeculae interface specimens (n=4) based on micro-CT images, this study aims to investigate the micromechanics of the interlock between cement and trabecular bone. Finite element micromotion between cement and trabeculae and bone strain were compared in the interdigitated trabeculae as well as strain in the bone distal to the interface. Lab-prepared specimens and their FE models were assumed to represent the immediate post-operative situation. The cement layer was removed in the FE models while retaining the loading conditions, which resulted in FE models that represented the pre-operative situation. Results showed that micromotion and bone strain decrease when interdigitation depth increases. Bone-cement micromotion and bone strain at the distal interdigitated region showed a dependence on bone volume fraction. Comparing the immediate post-operative and pre-operative situations, trabeculae embedded deep within the cement generally showed the highest level of strain-shielding. Strain shielding of interdigitated bone, in terms of reduction in compressive strains, was found to be between 35 and 61 % for the four specimens. Strain adaptive remodeling could thus be a plausible mechanism responsible for loss of interdigitated bone.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBone CementsBiomechanical PhenomenaCancellous BoneFinite Element AnalysisHumansTibiaBone CementsAseptic looseningBone-cement interfaceFinite element analysisMicromotionStrain shielding

Identifiers

PMID27889526
PMCPMC5192253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.