ArticleCurrent biology : CB2016
Two Bistable Switches Govern M Phase Entry.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- The periphery of nuclear speckles defines a spatially and temporally regulated compartment of long-lived intron-retained RNAs that resolves during mitosis.Nature cell biology · 2026Article
- Multifaceted Integrated Analysis of CDK1 and TOP2A Signaling Pathways for Multi-Target Therapeutic Intervention in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Synthetic Cell-Based Approaches to Dissect Autonomous Cellular Oscillators: Recent Applications on the Cell Cycle.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Physical Frameworks and Theories on How Autonomous Biological Oscillators Synchronize.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Mechanistic origins of temperature scaling in the early embryonic cell cycle.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Interdependency of estradiol-mediated ERα activation and subsequent PR and GREB1 induction to control cell cycle progression.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Newton's cradle: Cell cycle regulation by two mutually inhibitory oscillators.Mathematical biosciences · 2024Article
- Comprehensive Parameter Space Mapping of Cell Cycle Dynamics under Network Perturbations.ACS synthetic biology · 2024Article
- Reusable rule-based cell cycle model explains compartment-resolved dynamics of 16 observables in RPE-1 cells.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Substrate and phosphorylation site selection by phosphoprotein phosphatases.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2023Review
- Cell cycle oscillations driven by two interlinked bistable switches.Molecular biology of the cell · 2023Article
- On the assembly of the mitotic spindle, bistability and hysteresis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023Article
- Article
- Time-keeping and decision-making in the cell cycle.Interface focus · 2022Review
- Multi-synchronization and other patterns of multi-rhythmicity in oscillatory biological systems.Interface focus · 2022Review
- Structural, enzymatic and spatiotemporal regulation of PP2A-B55 phosphatase in the control of mitosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Review
- A general hypothesis of multistable systems in pathophysiology.F1000Research · 2022Article
- A modular approach for modeling the cell cycle based on functional response curves.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The abrupt and irreversible transition from interphase to M phase is essential to separate DNA replication from chromosome segregation. This transition requires the switch-like phosphorylation of hundreds of proteins by the cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1):cyclin B (CycB) complex. Previous studies have ascribed these switch-like phosphorylations to the auto-activation of Cdk1:CycB through the removal of inhibitory phosphorylations on Cdk1-Tyr15 [1, 2]. The positive feedback in Cdk1 activation creates a bistable switch that makes mitotic commitment irreversible [2-4]. Here, we surprisingly find that Cdk1 auto-activation is dispensable for irreversible, switch-like mitotic entry due to a second mechanism, whereby Cdk1:CycB inhibits its counteracting phosphatase (PP2A:B55). We show that the PP2A:B55-inhibiting Greatwall (Gwl)-endosulfine (ENSA) pathway is both necessary and sufficient for switch-like phosphorylations of mitotic substrates. Using purified components of the Gwl-ENSA pathway in a reconstituted system, we found a sharp Cdk1 threshold for phosphorylation of a luminescent mitotic substrate. The Cdk1 threshold to induce mitotic phosphorylation is distinctly higher than the Cdk1 threshold required to maintain these phosphorylations-evidence for bistability. A combination of mathematical modeling and biochemical reconstitution show that the bistable behavior of the Gwl-ENSA pathway emerges from its mutual antagonism with PP2A:B55. Our results demonstrate that two interlinked bistable mechanisms provide a robust solution for irreversible and switch-like mitotic entry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.