Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27888674›Full record

ArticleThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases

qPCR detection of Mycobacterium leprae in biopsies and slit skin smear of different leprosy clinical forms.

Michelle de Campos Soriani Azevedo, Natália Mortari Ramuno, Luciana Raquel Vincenzi Fachin, Mônica Tassa, Patrícia Sammarco Rosa, Andrea de Faria Fernandes Belone, Suzana Madeira Diório, Cleverson Teixeira Soares, Gustavo Pompermaier Garlet, Ana Paula Favaro Trombone

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. qPCR detection ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Challenges and advances in serological and molecular tests to aid leprosy diagnosis.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle de Campos Soriani AzevedoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Natália Mortari RamunoInstituto Lauro de Souza Lima, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Luciana Raquel Vincenzi FachinInstituto Lauro de Souza Lima, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Mônica TassaInstituto Lauro de Souza Lima, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Patrícia Sammarco RosaInstituto Lauro de Souza Lima, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Andrea de Faria Fernandes BeloneInstituto Lauro de Souza Lima, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Suzana Madeira DiórioInstituto Lauro de Souza Lima, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Cleverson Teixeira SoaresInstituto Lauro de Souza Lima, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Gustavo Pompermaier GarletUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Ana Paula Favaro TromboneUniversidade do Sagrado Coração, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Bauru, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: tromboneap@yahoo.com.br.
Instituto Lauro de Souza Lima · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Sagrado Coração · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leprosy, whose etiological agent is Mycobacterium leprae, is a chronic infectious disease that mainly affects the skin and peripheral nervous system. The diagnosis of leprosy is based on clinical evaluation, whereas histopathological analysis and bacilloscopy are complementary diagnostic tools. Quantitative PCR (qPCR), a current useful tool for diagnosis of infectious diseases, has been used to detect several pathogens including Mycobacterium leprae. The validation of this technique in a robust set of samples comprising the different clinical forms of leprosy is still necessary. Thus, in this study samples from 126 skin biopsies (collected from patients on all clinical forms and reactional states of leprosy) and 25 slit skin smear of leprosy patients were comparatively analyzed by qPCR (performed with primers for the RLEP region of M. leprae DNA) and routine bacilloscopy performed in histological sections or in slit skin smear. Considering clinical diagnostic as the gold standard, 84.9% of the leprosy patients were qPCR positive in skin biopsies, resulting in 84.92% sensitivity, with 84.92 and 61.22% positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, respectively. Concerning bacilloscopy of histological sections (BI/H), the sensitivity was 80.15% and the PPV and NPV were 80.15 and 44.44%, respectively. The concordance between qPCR and BI/H was 87.30%. Regarding the slit skin smear, 84% of the samples tested positive in the qPCR. Additionally, qPCR showed 100% specificity, since all samples from different mycobacteria, from healthy individuals, and from other granulomatous diseases presented negative results. In conclusion, the qPCR technique for detection of M. leprae using RLEP primers proved to be specific and sensitive, and qPCR can be used as a complementary test to diagnose leprosy irrespective of the clinical form of disease.

Indexed as

BiopsyDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersHumansLeprosyMycobacterium lepraeReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySkinDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersBacilloscopyLeprosyMycobacterium lepraeqPCR

Identifiers

PMID27888674
PMCPMC9425481
OpenAlexW2553901927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.