Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27888459›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)2016

Comparative analysis of bacterial diversity in the rhizosphere of tomato by culture-dependent and -independent approaches.

Shin Ae Lee, Jiyoung Park, Bora Chu, Jeong Myeong Kim, Jae-Ho Joa, Mee Kyung Sang, Jaekyeong Song, Hang-Yeon Weon

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Formation, characterization and modeling of emergent synthetic microbial communities.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shin Ae LeeAgricultural Microbiology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju, 55365, Republic of Korea.
Jiyoung ParkAgricultural Microbiology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju, 55365, Republic of Korea.
Bora ChuAgricultural Microbiology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju, 55365, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Myeong KimAgricultural Microbiology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju, 55365, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Ho JoaResearch Institute of Climate Change and Agriculture, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA, Jeju, 63240, Republic of Korea.
Mee Kyung SangAgricultural Microbiology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju, 55365, Republic of Korea.
Jaekyeong SongAgricultural Microbiology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju, 55365, Republic of Korea.
Hang-Yeon WeonAgricultural Microbiology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju, 55365, Republic of Korea. why@korea.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiome in the rhizosphere-the region surrounding plant roots-plays a key role in plant growth and health, enhancing nutrient availability and protecting plants from biotic and abiotic stresses. To assess bacterial diversity in the tomato rhizosphere, we performed two contrasting approaches: culture-dependent and -independent. In the culture-dependent approach, two culture media (Reasoner's 2A agar and soil extract agar) were supplemented with 12 antibiotics for isolating diverse bacteria from the tomato rhizosphere by inhibiting predominant bacteria. A total of 689 bacterial isolates were clustered into 164 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% sequence similarity, and these were found to belong to five bacterial phyla (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, and Firmicutes). Of these, 122 OTUs were retrieved from the antibiotic-containing media, and 80 OTUs were recovered by one specific antibiotic-containing medium. In the culture-independent approach, we conducted Illumina MiSeq amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and obtained 19,215 high-quality sequences, which clustered into 478 OTUs belonging to 16 phyla. Among the total OTUs from the MiSeq dataset, 22% were recovered in the culture collection, whereas 41% of OTUs in the culture collection were not captured by MiSeq sequencing. These results showed that antibiotics were effective in isolating various taxa that were not readily isolated on antibiotic-free media, and that both contrasting approaches provided complementary information to characterize bacterial diversity in the tomato rhizosphere.

Indexed as

BiodiversityRhizosphereSoil MicrobiologyActinobacteriaAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacteriological TechniquesCulture MediaDNA, BacterialMicrobiotaPhylogenyPlant RootsProteobacteriaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASolanum lycopersicumAnti-Bacterial AgentsCulture MediaDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16Santibioticsbacteriaculture collectiondiversitytomato rhizosphere

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.