ArticleInternational orthopaedics2017
Total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility cup in osteonecrosis of the femoral head in young patients: over ten years of follow-up.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years old: a systematic review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Survivorship of the dual-mobility construct in elective primary total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis including registry data.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Comparing dislocation rates by approach following elective primary dual mobility total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Pooled it
- Risk factors and modes of failure in the modern dual mobility implant. A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Pooled it
- Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2018Pooled it
- Early Rehabilitation and Periprosthetic Bone Environment after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Orthopaedic surgery · 2021Trial
- Knowledge, attitude, practice, and influencing factors among patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Dual Mobility Acetabular Cup Utilization in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Mitigating Instability Risks.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- Article
- Insight into Steroid-Induced ONFH: The Molecular Mechanism and Function of Epigenetic Modification in Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- The Performance of Primary Dual-Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Aged 55 Years and Younger: A Systematic Review.Arthroplasty today · 2023Article
- Hip Preservation or Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Retrospective Case-Control Study of Factors Influencing Arthroplasty Decision-Making for Patients with Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head in China.Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Article
- Dual Mobility Total Hip Replacements in Young Patients- A Systematic Review.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023Review
- An early experience of the use of dual mobility cup uncemented total hip arhroplasty in young patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2022Article
- Third generation Dual Mobility Cups: could be the future in total hip arthroplasty? A five-year experience with dualis.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022Article
- A review of the clinical and engineering performance of dual-mobility cups for total hip arthroplasty.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Pelvic mobility before and after total hip arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2020Article
- Use of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: Indications and outcomes.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2020Review
- Article
- Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Where Do We Stand Today?: A 5-Year Update.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteonecrosis of the femoral head affects mainly young patients with high functional needs this increases the risk of dislocation. Dual mobility cups known for low rate of dislocation and high mobility range seems indicated. We evaluate functional efficiency, survival and dislocation rate of dual mobility cup for total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis in young patients. Monocentric retrospective clinical study, from 2000 to 2008. With a clinical analysis in pre-operative and over ten years of follow-up of one cohort of patients under 55 years old with an indication of THA for ONFH. The judgement criteria was: clinical scores at the maximal follow-up, the dislocation rate, and the cumulate survival rate over ten years follow-up. Forty THA in 31 patients, nine bilateral cases, 23 males and eight females with average age of 44 (±4) years old. In pre-operative: PMA 11 (±3.3), HHS 50,8 (±15.5). At the final follow-up of 129.8 (±33.8) months: PMA (17.4 ± 1.12), HHS (95.7 ± 6.9), no dislocation. We had 11 deaths on average at 95.2 ± 47.3 months. The cumulate survival rate over ten years follow-up is 100% without revisions or long-term dislocation. Analysis concludes to very significant functional improvement without any dislocation despite the young population with high level of activity. Thus, dual mobility cups is a reliable choice preventing dislocation with a very good survival rate without premature wear, preserving mobility and activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.