Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27887677›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of surgery2017

Outcome disparities between African Americans and Caucasians in contemporary kidney transplant recipients.

David J Taber, Leonard E Egede, Prabhakar K Baliga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetic versus self-reported African ancestry of the recipient and neighborhood predictors of kidney transplantation outcomes in 2 multiethnic urban cohorts.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Apolipoprotein L1: role in the evaluation of kidney transplant donors.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Concepts of Genomics in Kidney Transplantation.Current transplantation reports · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David J TaberDivision of Transplant Surgery, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. Electronic address: taberd@musc.edu.
Leonard E EgedeCenter for Health Disparities Research, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Prabhakar K BaligaDivision of Transplant Surgery, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Funding

Impact of Cardiovascular Risk Control on Racial Disparities in Kidney TransplantK23DK099440 · NIDDK · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI TABER, DAVID J. · 2014 to 2017
$715k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK099440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRacial disparities in African-American (AA) kidney transplant have persisted for nearly 40 years, with limited data available on the scope of this issue in the contemporary era of transplantation.

methodsDescriptive retrospective cohort study of US registry data including adult solitary kidney transplants between Jan 1, 2005 to Dec 31, 2009.

results60,695 recipients were included; 41,426 Caucasians (68%) and 19,269 AAs (32%). At baseline, AAs were younger, had lower college graduation rates, were more likely to be receiving public health insurance and have diabetes. At one-year post-transplant, AAs had 62% higher risk of graft loss (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.50-1.75) which increased to 93% at five years (RR 1.93, 95% CI 1.85-2.01). Adjusted risk of graft loss, accounting for baseline characteristics, was 60% higher in AAs (HR 1.61 [1.52-1.69]). AAs had significantly higher risk of acute rejection and delayed graft function.

conclusionAAs continue to experience disproportionately high rates of graft loss within the contemporary era of transplant, which are related to a convergence of an array of socioeconomic and biologic risk factors.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanKidney TransplantationTransplant RecipientsWhite PeopleAge DistributionBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesCreatinineDelayed Graft FunctionDiabetes MellitusEducational StatusFemaleGraft RejectionHumansHypertensionMaleCreatinineAcute rejectionAfrican AmericansGraft lossKidney transplant

Identifiers

PMID27887677
PMCPMC5373991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.