ReviewRadiation protection dosimetry2016
Using Stable Free Radicals to Obtain Unique and Clinically Useful Data In Vivo in Human Subjects.
Review in Radiation protection dosimetry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards Characterization of Skin Melanoma in the Clinic by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Spectroscopy and Imaging of Melanin.Molecular imaging and biology · 2024Review
- Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Characterization of Sodium- and Carbonate-Containing Hydroxyapatite Cement.Inorganic chemistry · 2022Article
- Review
- Development of the Implantable Resonator System for Clinical EPR Oximetry.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper attempts to: (1) provide a critical overview of the challenges and opportunities to extend electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) into practical applications in human subjects, based on EPR measurements made in vivo; (2) summarize the clinical applications of EPR for improving treatments in cancer, wound healing and diabetic care, emphasizing EPR's unique capability to measure tissue oxygen repeatedly and with particular sensitivity to hypoxia and (3) summarize the capabilities of in vivo EPR to measure radiation dose for triage and medical guidance after a large-scale radiation exposure. The conclusion is that while still at a relatively early stage of its development and availability, clinical applications of EPR already have demonstrated significant value and the field is likely to grow in both the extent of its applications and its impact on significant problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.