ArticleNature microbiology2016
Reply to 'Is LUCA a thermophilic progenote?'
Article in Nature microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The molecular mechanism of ATP synthase constrains the evolutionary landscape of chemiosmosis.Biophysical journal · 2025Review
- On the Nature of the Last Common Ancestor: A Story from its Translation Machinery.Journal of molecular evolution · 2024Review
- The Last Universal Common Ancestor of Ribosome-Encoding Organisms: Portrait of LUCA.Journal of molecular evolution · 2024Review
- The Unfinished Reconstructed Nature of the Last Universal Common Ancestor.Journal of molecular evolution · 2024Review
- Why pyridoxal phosphate could be a functional predecessor of thiamine pyrophosphate and speculations on a primordial metabolism.RSC chemical biology · 2024Review
- Replicated life-history patterns and subsurface origins of the bacterial sister phyla Nitrospirota and Nitrospinota.The ISME journal · 2023Article
- The last universal common ancestor between ancient Earth chemistry and the onset of genetics.PLoS genetics · 2018Review
- Self-Referential Encoding on Modules of Anticodon Pairs-Roots of the Biological Flow System.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27886196What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.