Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27886185›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2017

Hyper-IL-6: a potent and efficacious stimulator of RGC regeneration.

D Fischer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Silencing the enhancer of zeste homologue 2,Neural regeneration research · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

D FischerDepartment of Neurology, Division of Experimental Neurology, Heinrich-Heine-University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mature retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) normally fail to regenerate injured axons and die soon after optic nerve injury. Research over the last two decades has demonstrated that application of IL-6-like cytokines or activation of respective downstream signaling pathways promote neuroprotection and optic nerve regeneration. However, the overall beneficial effects of natural cytokines remain usually rather moderate, possibly due to intrinsic signaling pathway inhibitors, such as PTEN or SOCS3, or a limited expression of specific cytokine receptors in RGCs. It was recently demonstrated that directly targeting the gp130 receptor, a common signalling receptor of all IL-6-like cytokines, induces stronger RGC axon regeneration in vitro and in vivo than other known growth-promoting treatments such as inflammatory stimulation or PTEN knockout. Remarkably, continuous expression of hyper-IL-6 (hIL-6) upon intravitreal AAV injection after nerve injury enables long-distance axon regeneration, with some axons growing through the optic chiasm 6 weeks after optic nerve injury. Thus, AAV-mediated hIL-6 delivery is so far one of the strongest single, post-injury treatments for the promotion of optic nerve regeneration and may be suitable for the development of novel, clinically applicable therapeutic treatments for human patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsCytokine Receptor gp130Genetic TherapyHumansInterleukin-6Nerve RegenerationOptic Nerve InjuriesRetinal Ganglion CellsSignal TransductionCytokine Receptor gp130Interleukin-6

Identifiers

PMID27886185
PMCPMC5306455
OpenAlexW2554716245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.