Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27886114›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2016

AutoDock-GIST: Incorporating Thermodynamics of Active-Site Water into Scoring Function for Accurate Protein-Ligand Docking.

Shota Uehara, Shigenori Tanaka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Solvation Energetic Costs of Cognate Binding Site Formation.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  3. The Art and Science of Molecular Docking.Annual review of biochemistry · 2024
    Review
  4. Free Energy Density of a Fluid and Its Role in Solvation and Binding.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. WaterKit: Thermodynamic Profiling of Protein Hydration Sites.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Article
  7. Inhibitory effects ofHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Predicting Protein-Ligand Docking Structure with Graph Neural Network.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Computational healthcare: Present and future perspectives (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Applications of water molecules for analysis of macromolecule properties.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shota UeharaDepartment of Computational Science, Graduate School of System Informatics, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan. uehara@eniac.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp.
Shigenori TanakaDepartment of Computational Science, Graduate School of System Informatics, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan. tanaka2@kobe-u.ac.jp.
Kobe University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water plays a significant role in the binding process between protein and ligand. However, the thermodynamics of water molecules are often underestimated, or even ignored, in protein-ligand docking. Usually, the free energies of active-site water molecules are substantially different from those of waters in the bulk region. The binding of a ligand to a protein causes a displacement of these waters from an active site to bulk, and this displacement process substantially contributes to the free energy change of protein-ligand binding. The free energy of active-site water molecules can be calculated by grid inhomogeneous solvation theory (GIST), using molecular dynamics (MD) and the trajectory of a target protein and water molecules. Here, we show a case study of the combination of GIST and a docking program and discuss the effectiveness of the displacing gain of unfavorable water in protein-ligand docking. We combined the GIST-based desolvation function with the scoring function of AutoDock4, which is called AutoDock-GIST. The proposed scoring function was assessed employing 51 ligands of coagulation factor Xa (FXa), and results showed that both scoring accuracy and docking success rate were improved. We also evaluated virtual screening performance of AutoDock-GIST using FXa ligands in the directory of useful decoys-enhanced (DUD-E), thus finding that the displacing gain of unfavorable water is effective for a successful docking campaign.

Indexed as

Catalytic DomainComputational BiologyLigandsModels, MolecularMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingProteinsThermodynamicsWaterLigandsProteinsWaterAutoDock4binding-site watergrid inhomogeneous solvation theory (GIST)protein-ligand dockingvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID27886114
PMCPMC6274120
OpenAlexW2549694484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.