Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27886045›Full record

ReviewNutrients2016

Nutrition, One-Carbon Metabolism and Neural Tube Defects: A Review.

Kelei Li, Mark L Wahlqvist, Duo Li

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Associations between Biomarkers of Vitamin BThe Journal of nutrition · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin B6.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. One carbon metabolism and early development: a diet-dependent destiny.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kelei LiDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. wfujfqcc@sina.com.
Mark L WahlqvistFuli Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. mark.wahlqvist@gmail.com.
Duo LiDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. duoli@zju.edu.cn.
Monash University · AUZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural tube defects (NTDs) are a group of severe congenital malformations, induced by the combined effects of genes and the environment. The most valuable finding so far has been the protective effect of folic acid supplementation against NTDs. However, many women do not take folic acid supplements until they are pregnant, which is too late to prevent NTDs effectively. Long-term intake of folic acid-fortified food is a good choice to solve this problem, and mandatory folic acid fortification should be further promoted, especially in Europe, Asia and Africa. Vitamin B2, vitamin B-6, vitamin B-12, choline, betaine and

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutritional StatusAnencephalyAnimalsCarbonFemaleFolic AcidFolic Acid DeficiencyFood, FortifiedGene-Environment InteractionHumansNutritive ValuePregnancyRecommended Dietary AllowancesRisk FactorsCarbonFolic Acidalcoholbetainecholinecoffeefolateneural tube defectsone-carbon metabolismteavitamin B

Identifiers

PMID27886045
PMCPMC5133124
OpenAlexW2555360829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.