Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27886009›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2017

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Combined Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid t-PrP, t-tau, p-tau, and Aβ42 in the Differential Diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease from Alzheimer's Disease with Emphasis on Atypical Disease Variants.

Samir Abu Rumeileh, Francesca Lattanzio, Michelangelo Stanzani Maserati, Romana Rizzi, Sabina Capellari, Piero Parchi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. FDG-PET patterns associate with survival in patients with prion disease.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Prion protein quantification in human cerebrospinal fluid as a tool for prion disease drug development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samir Abu RumeilehDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesca LattanzioDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Michelangelo Stanzani MaseratiIRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Romana RizziDepartment of Neurology, IRCCS Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Sabina CapellariDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Piero ParchiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Institute of Neurological Sciences · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITOspedale Santa Maria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to recent studies, the determination of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) total tau (t-tau)/phosphorylated tau (p-tau) ratio and total prion protein (t-PrP) levels significantly improves the accuracy of the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in atypical cases with clinical or laboratory features mimicking Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD). However, this has neither been validated nor tested in series including atypical CJD variants. Furthermore, the added diagnostic value of amyloid-β (Aβ)42 remains unclear. To address these issues, we measured t-PrP, 14-3-3, t-tau, p-tau, and Aβ42 CSF levels in 45 typical and 44 atypical/rapidly progressive AD patients, 54 typical and 54 atypical CJD patients, and 33 controls. CJD patients showed significantly lower CSF t-PrP levels than controls and AD patients. Furthermore, atypical CJD was associated with lower t-PrP levels in comparison to typical CJD. T-tau, 14-3-3, or t-PrP alone yielded, respectively, 80.6, 63.0, and 73.0% sensitivity and 75.3, 92.1, and 75% specificity in distinguishing AD from CJD. On receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses of biomarker combinations, the (t-tau×Aβ42)/(p-tau×t-PrP) ratio achieved the best accuracy, with 98.1% sensitivity and 97.7% specificity overall, and 96.2% sensitivity and 95.5% specificity for the "atypical" disease groups. Our results show that the combined analysis of CSF t-PrP, t-tau, p-tau, and Aβ42 is clinically useful in the differential diagnosis between CJD and AD. Furthermore, the finding of reduced CSF t-PrP levels in CJD patients suggest that, likewise Aβ42 in AD, CSF t-PrP levels reflect the extent of PrPc conversion into abnormal PrP (PrPSc) and the burden of PrPSc deposition in CJD.

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorCreutzfeldt-Jakob SyndromeDiagnosis, DifferentialDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingElectroencephalographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPeptide FragmentsPhosphorylationPrionstau ProteinsAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)Amyloid beta-Protein PrecursorPeptide FragmentsPrionstau ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseaseamyloid-βbiomarkercerebrospinal fluidCreutzfeldt-Jakob diseaseprion proteintau protein

Identifiers

PMID27886009
PMCPMC5181677
OpenAlexW2555052136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.