Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27885772›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2017

Clinical practice patterns on the use of magnesium sulphate for treatment of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia: a multi-country survey.

Q Long, O T Oladapo, S Leathersich, J P Vogel, G Carroli, P Lumbiganon, Z Qureshi, A M Gülmezoglu, WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health Research Network

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Assessing multidimensional care coverage for pre-eclampsia in the era of universal health coverage: A pre-post evaluation of the Salud Mesoamérica Initiative.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Q LongUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
O T OladapoUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
S LeathersichKing Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, Perth, WA, Australia.
J P VogelUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
G CarroliCentro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales, Rosario, Argentina.
P LumbiganonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Z QureshiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
A M GülmezogluUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health Research Network
World Health Organization · CHCentro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales · ARKhon Kaen University · THKing Edward Memorial Hospital · AUUniversity of Nairobi · KE

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterise the current clinical practice patterns regarding the use of magnesium sulphate (MgSO

designCross-sectional survey.

settingA total of 147 health facilities in 15 countries across Africa, Latin America and Asia. POPULATION: Heads of obstetric departments or maternity units.

methodsAnonymous online and paper-based survey conducted in 2015.

main outcome measuresAvailability and use of MgSO

resultsMagnesium sulphate and a formal protocol for its administration were reported to be always available in 87.4% and 86.4% of all facilities, respectively. MgSO

conclusionsThe reported clinical use of MgSO TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: MgSO

Indexed as

AfricaAsiaCross-Sectional StudiesEclampsiaFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansLatin AmericaMagnesium SulfatePractice Patterns, Physicians'Pre-EclampsiaPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesTocolytic AgentsMagnesium SulfateTocolytic Agentsdosing regimeneclampsialow- and middle-income settingsmagneisum sulphatepre-eclampsia

Identifiers

PMID27885772
PMCPMC5697690
OpenAlexW2550193595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.