Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27885547›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2017

Identifying High Ability Children with DSM-5 Autism Spectrum or Social Communication Disorder: Performance on Autism Diagnostic Instruments.

Megan Foley-Nicpon, Staci L Fosenburg, Kristin G Wurster, Susan G Assouline

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Social Communication Disorder Screener.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Diagnosis of Autism: From Kanner to DSM-III to DSM-5 and Beyond.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Megan Foley-NicponThe University of Iowa, N361 Lindquist Center, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA. Megan-foley-nicpon@uiowa.edu.
Staci L FosenburgThe University of Iowa, N361 Lindquist Center, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Kristin G WursterThe University of Iowa, N361 Lindquist Center, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Susan G AssoulineThe University of Iowa, N361 Lindquist Center, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was a replication of Mazefsky et al.'s (Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities 43:1236-1242, 2013) investigation among a sample of 45 high ability children and adolescents diagnosed with ASD under DSM-IV-TR. Items from the ADOS and ADI-R were mapped onto DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ASD and SCD to determine whether participants would meet either diagnosis under DSM-5. If the ADOS were administered alone, 62% of individuals diagnosed with ASD would no longer meet criteria under DSM-5; however, when the ADI-R and ADOS scores were combined, 100% of individuals would continue to meet ASD diagnosis. The ADOS was determined to be an insufficient measure for SCD due to the small number of algorithm items measuring SCD diagnostic criteria, suggesting the development of SCD measures is required.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersAdolescentAlgorithmsAutistic DisorderChildChild, PreschoolDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleHumansMaleSocial Communication DisorderASDAutismDSM-5High abilitySCD

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.