Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27884978›Full record

ReviewBioscience reports2016

Oestrogen receptor negativity in breast cancer: a cause or consequence?

Vijaya Narasihma Reddy Gajulapalli, Vijaya Lakshmi Malisetty, Suresh Kumar Chitta, Bramanandam Manavathi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioscience reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. FKBP52 and FKBP51 differentially regulate the stability of estrogen receptor in breast cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vijaya Narasihma Reddy GajulapalliDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular and Cellular Oncology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad 500046, India.
Vijaya Lakshmi MalisettyDepartment of Biotechnology, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh 522510, India.
Suresh Kumar ChittaDepartment of Biochemistry, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh 515002, India.
Bramanandam ManavathiDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular and Cellular Oncology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad 500046, India manavathibsl@uohyd.ernet.in manavbrahma@gmail.com.
University of Hyderabad · INAcharya Nagarjuna University · INSri Krishnadevaraya University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endocrine resistance, which occurs either by de novo or acquired route, is posing a major challenge in treating hormone-dependent breast cancers by endocrine therapies. The loss of oestrogen receptor α (ERα) expression is the vital cause of establishing endocrine resistance in this subtype. Understanding the mechanisms that determine the causes of this phenomenon are therefore essential to reduce the disease efficacy. But how we negate oestrogen receptor (ER) negativity and endocrine resistance in breast cancer is questionable. To answer that, two important approaches are considered: (1) understanding the cellular origin of heterogeneity and ER negativity in breast cancers and (2) characterization of molecular regulators of endocrine resistance. Breast tumours are heterogeneous in nature, having distinct molecular, cellular, histological and clinical behaviour. Recent advancements in perception of the heterogeneity of breast cancer revealed that the origin of a particular mammary tumour phenotype depends on the interactions between the cell of origin and driver genetic hits. On the other hand, histone deacetylases (HDACs), DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), miRNAs and ubiquitin ligases emerged as vital molecular regulators of ER negativity in breast cancers. Restoring response to endocrine therapy through re-expression of ERα by modulating the expression of these molecular regulators is therefore considered as a relevant concept that can be implemented in treating ER-negative breast cancers. In this review, we will thoroughly discuss the underlying mechanisms for the loss of ERα expression and provide the future prospects for implementing the strategies to negate ER negativity in breast cancers.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsDNA MethylationEstrogen AntagonistsEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic HeterogeneityHistone DeacetylasesHumansMiceMicroRNAsNeoplasms, Hormone-DependentTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalEstrogen AntagonistsEstrogen Receptor alphaHistone DeacetylasesMicroRNAsendocrine resistanceepigenetic factorsmicroRNAs (miRNAs)oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast canceroestrogen receptor αubiquitin ligases

Identifiers

PMID27884978
PMCPMC5180249
OpenAlexW2553492922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.