Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27884917›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2016

Managing barriers to empathy in the clinical encounter: a qualitative interview study with GPs.

Frans Awm Derksen, Tim C Olde Hartman, Jozien M Bensing, Antoine Lm Lagro-Janssen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. "International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Guarding against dispassion for doctors in the NHS.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2018
    Article
  16. Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measures to Promote Integrated Care.International journal of integrated care · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frans Awm DerksenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Gender and Women's Health, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Tim C Olde HartmanDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jozien M BensingDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, the Netherlands.
Antoine Lm Lagro-JanssenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Gender and Women's Health, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent daily general practice has become increasingly technical and somatically oriented (where attention to patients' feelings is decreased) due to an increase in protocol-based guidelines. Priorities in GP-patient communication have shifted from a focus on listening and empathy to task-oriented communication.

aimTo explore what barriers GPs experience when applying empathy in daily practice, and how these barriers are managed. DESIGN AND

settingThirty Dutch GPs with sufficient heterogeneity in sex, age, type of practice, and rural or urban setting were interviewed.

methodThe consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) were applied. The verbatim transcripts were then analysed.

resultsAccording to participating GPs, the current emphasis on protocol-driven care can be a significant barrier to genuineness in communication. Other potential barriers mentioned were time pressures and constraints, and dealing with patients displaying 'unruly behaviour' or those with personality disorders. GPs indicated that it can be difficult to balance emotional involvement and professional distance. Longer consulting times, smaller practice populations, and efficient practice organisation were described as practical solutions. In order to focus on a patient-as-person approach, GPs strongly suggested that deviating from guidelines should be possible when necessary as an element of good-quality care. Joining intercollegiate counselling groups was also discussed.

conclusionIn addition to practical solutions for barriers to behaving empathically, GPs indicated that they needed more freedom to balance working with protocols and guidelines, as well as a patient-as-person and patient-as-partner approach. This balance is necessary to remain connected with patients and to deliver care that is truly personal.

Indexed as

EmpathyGeneral PracticeAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansInterviews as TopicJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPhysician-Patient RelationsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Qualitative Researchempathic behaviourempathypatient-centred careprimary health careprotocol-driven careshared responsibility

Identifiers

PMID27884917
PMCPMC5198671
OpenAlexW2531390521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.