Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27884849›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

ACCESS HD pilot: A randomised feasibility trial Comparing Catheters with fistulas in Elderly patientS Starting haemodialysis.

Robert Quinn, Pietro Ravani, ACCESS HD Investigators

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02675569 (ACCESS HD Pilot), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02675569 naunknown statusnot on this map

ACCESS HD Pilot: A Randomized Trial Comparing Catheters to Fistulas in Elderly patientS Starting HemoDialysis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2016 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsEnd-stage Kidney FailureArmsCatheter, Fistula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Shared decision making in elderly patients with kidney failure.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert QuinnCumming School of Medicine/Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Pietro RavaniCumming School of Medicine/Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
ACCESS HD Investigators
Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

CIHR FRN 142342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe selection of the type of vascular access for haemodialysis is an important intervention question. However, only observational studies are available to inform decision-making in this area, and they are at high risk of selection bias. While a clinical trial comparing the effects of the 2 most frequently chosen strategies for haemodialysis access (fistulas and catheters) on patient important and 'hard' clinical end points is needed, the feasibility of such a trial is uncertain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This open-label pilot randomised controlled trial will test the feasibility and safety of randomising elderly people (≥65 years) who start haemodialysis with a central venous catheter (the most common initial type of haemodialysis access), and are eligible to receive a fistula, to a catheter-based strategy (comparator) or to a fistula-based strategy (intervention). We will enrol 100 patients at 10 centres across Canada. Participants assigned to the catheter-strategy arm will continue to use catheters; participants assigned to the fistula-strategy arm will receive a surgical attempt at fistula creation. The inclusion criteria are designed to minimise the risk of protocol violation and attrition. The primary outcome is feasibility, which we will assess by measuring: (1) the proportion of participants deemed eligible for the trial who consent to randomisation; and (2) the proportion of participants randomised to the intervention who receive the fistula surgery within 90 days of randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include safety outcomes, the reasons people and healthcare providers may not accept randomisation, and the reasons sites may not adhere to the trial protocol. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary approved the study protocol. We will submit the results of this feasibility study in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02675569, Pre-results.

Indexed as

Central Venous CathetersFistulaPatient SafetyAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMalePilot ProjectsRenal DialysisResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeArteriovenous fistulaCentral venous catheterHaemodialysisKidney failureVascular access

Identifiers

PMID27884849
PMCPMC5168520
OpenAlexW2551053764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.