Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27884813›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2016

Development and Feasibility Testing of PROMPT-Care, an eHealth System for Collection and Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care: A Study Protocol.

Afaf Girgis, Geoff P Delaney, Anthony Arnold, Alexis Andrew Miller, Janelle V Levesque, Nasreen Kaadan, Martin G Carolan, Nicole Cook, Kenneth Masters, Thomas T Tran and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Electronic finance-related outcome measures (eFROMs): a new approach to screen for cancer-related financial toxicity in clinical practice.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  6. A pilot study of population-based, patient-reported outcome collection in cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Afaf GirgisCentre for Oncology Education and Research Translation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4101-4006
Geoff P DelaneyCentre for Oncology Education and Research Translation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1829-396X
Anthony ArnoldCentre for Oncology Education and Research Translation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4866-8125
Alexis Andrew MillerIllawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3044-3358
Janelle V LevesqueCentre for Oncology Education and Research Translation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6982-2086
Nasreen KaadanCentre for Oncology Education and Research Translation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1274-1212
Martin G CarolanCentre for Oncology Education and Research Translation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6671-029X
Nicole CookCancer Institute New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4439-4200
Kenneth MastersIllawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2213-0175
Thomas T TranCentre for Oncology Education and Research Translation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-5065
Tiffany SandellIllawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8935-7676
Ivana DurcinoskaCentre for Oncology Education and Research Translation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9568-0058
Martha GergesCentre for Oncology Education and Research Translation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8493-7196
Sandra AveryCentre for Oncology Education and Research Translation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3444-573X
Weng NgCentre for Oncology Education and Research Translation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2354-1857
Stephen Della-FiorentinaMacarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Campbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1017-5595
Haryana M DhillonFaculty of Science, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4039-5169
Ashley MaherDidymo Designs, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9259-1666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-reported outcome (PRO) measures have been used widely to screen for depression, anxiety, and symptoms in cancer patients. Computer-based applications that collect patients' responses and transfer them to the treating health professional in real time have the potential to improve patient well-being and cancer outcomes.

objectiveThis study will test the feasibility and acceptability of a newly developed eHealth system which facilitates PRO data capture from cancer patients, data linkage and retrieval to support clinical decisions and patient self-management, and data retrieval to support ongoing evaluation and innovative research.

methodsThe eHealth system is being developed in consultation with 3 overarching content-specific expert advisory groups convened for this project: the clinical advisory group, technical advisory group, and evaluation advisory group. The following work has already been completed during this phase of the study: the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) eHealth system was developed, patient-reported outcomes were selected (distress, symptoms, unmet needs), algorithms to inform intervention thresholds for clinical and self-management were determined, clinician PRO feedback summary and longitudinal reports were designed, and patient self-management resources were collated. PROsaiq, a custom information technology system, will transfer PRO data in real time into the hospital-based oncology information system to support clinical decision making. The PROMPT-Care system feasibility and acceptability will be assessed through patients completing PROMPT-Care assessments, participating in face-to-face cognitive interviews, and completing evaluation surveys and telephone interviews and oncology staff participating in telephone interviews.

resultsOver the course of 3 months, the system will be pilot-tested with up to 50 patients receiving treatment or follow-up care and 6 oncology staff at 2 hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Data will be collected to determine the accuracy and completeness of data transfer procedures, extent of missing data from participants' assessments, acceptability of the eHealth system and usefulness of the self-management resources (via patient evaluation surveys and interviews), and acceptability and perceived usefulness of real-time PRO reporting (via oncology staff interviews) at the completion of the pilot phase.

conclusionsThis research investigates implementation of evidence into real world clinical practice through development of an efficient and user-friendly eHealth system. This study of feasibility and acceptability of the newly developed eHealth system will inform the next stage of larger scale testing and future implementation of the system as part of routine care. CLINICALTRIAL: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN1261500135294; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=369299&isReview=true (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6lzylG5A0).

Indexed as

eHealth, self-managementelectronic medical recordsoncologyoncology information systemspatient-centered carepatient-reported outcomesPROMPT-Carereal-time report

Identifiers

PMID27884813
PMCPMC5146324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.