ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016
The Spanish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E): reliability and validity assessment.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06106867 (The Effect of External Pressure Applı̇ed to the Palm on Labor Paı̇n and Childbirth Experı̇ence), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of External Pressure Applı̇ed to the Palm on Labor Paı̇n and Childbirth Experı̇ence
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Women's Childbirth Experiences in the WILL Randomised Trial (When to Induce Labour to Limit Risk in Pregnancy Hypertension): A Mixed Methods Analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025Trial
- Women's childbirth experiences in the Swedish Post-term Induction Study (SWEPIS): a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.BMJ open · 2021Trial
- Exploring Priority Intrapartum Services Associated with Childbirth Experience During Vaginal Birth: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Mobilisation Protocol in the Management of Posterior Foetal Presentations: A Multicentre Observational Pilot Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Childbirth Experience Among Primiparous Women in Latvia Using Short-Quality from Patient's Perspective (s-QPP) Questionnaire and Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ).Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Childbirth Experience, Mistreatment, and Migrant Status: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2025Article
- A Spanish-Language Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Trust in Pregnancy Care Clinician.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Network analysis of postpartum depression symptoms and perinatal risk factors in Chinese women: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Article
- Cultural adaptation, validation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2.0 in the Spanish context.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Prenatal Stress as a Risk Factor for Maternal-Foetal Morbidity: A Longitudinal Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Cultural Adaptation, Validation and Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of an Obstetric Violence Scale in the Spanish Context.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2023Article
- Overall childbirth experience: what does it mean? A comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Antenatal Fear of Childbirth as a Risk Factor for a Bad Childbirth Experience.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Adaption and validation of the childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ-SK) in Slovakia.European journal of midwifery · 2023Article
- Comparison of primiparous women's childbirth experience in labor induction with cervical ripening by balloon catheter or oral misoprostol - a prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS).Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022Article
- Childbirth Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Hospital in Southwestern Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Psychometric Evaluation of the Malay Version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-My).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) was originally designed to study women's perceptions of labour and birth. The main objective of our study was to adapt the CEQ to the Spanish context and determine its psychometric properties. This would provide an opportunity to evaluate women's experiences in order to improve evidence in the Spanish context as recommended by national guidelines.
methodsThe CEQ was translated into Spanish using a standard forward and back translation method (CEQ-E). A convenience sample of 364 women was recruited from 3 Spanish hospitals; all participants were able to read and write in Spanish. Mothers with high risk pregnancies or preterm deliveries were excluded from the study. A self-administered questionnaire on sociodemographic variables was completed by participants before discharge. Data on childbirth variables were obtained from maternity records. Between 1 and 3 months postpartum a postal CEQ-E questionnaire was sent. The CEQ-E structure was examined by a confirmatory factor analysis of polychoric correlations using a diagonally weighted least squares estimator. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was conducted by testing differences in CEQ-E scores between known-groups (to differ on key variables).
results226 (62.1%) of the recruited participants completed the postal questionnaire. The CEQ-E factor structure was similar to the original one. The Spanish version showed fit statistics in line with standard recommendations: CFI = 0.97; NNFI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.066; SRMS = 0.077. The internal consistency reliability of the CEQ-E was good for the overall scale (0.88) and for all subscales (0.80, 0.90, 0.76, 0.68 for "own capacity", "professional support", "perceived safety" and "participation", respectively) and similar to the original version. Women with a labour duration ≤ 12 h, women with a labour not induced, women with a normal birth and multiparous women showed higher overall CEQ-E scores and "perceived safety" subscale scores. Women with a labour duration ≤ 12 h and those with previous experience of labour obtained higher scores for the "own capacity" and "participation" subscales.
conclusionsThe results of this study indicate that the CEQ-E can be considered a valid and reliable measure of women's perceptions of labour and birth in Spain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.