ArticleBMC genomics2016
Structural features of DNA that determine RNA polymerase II core promoter.
Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural Features of DNA in TATA-Containing and TATA-Less Core Promoters of RNA Polymerase II Differ.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Structural Features of DNA in tRNA Genes and Their Upstream Sequences.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Distinctive physical properties of DNA shared by RNA polymerase II gene promoters and 5'-flanking regions of tRNA genes.Journal of biochemistry · 2024Article
- Physical Peculiarity of Two Sites in Human Promoters: Universality and Diverse Usage in Gene Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Core Promoter Regions of Antisense and Long Intergenic Non-Coding RNAs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- On the Role of TATA Boxes and TATA-Binding Protein inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Evolutionary Invariant of the Structure of DNA Double Helix in RNAP II Core Promoters.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- TSSFinder-fast and accurate ab initio prediction of the core promoter in eukaryotic genomes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- A Method for Identification of the Methylation Level of CpG Islands From NGS Data.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Physicochemical Foundations of Life that Direct Evolution: Chance and Natural Selection are not Evolutionary Driving Forces.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe general structure and action of all eukaryotic and archaeal RNA polymerases machinery have an astonishing similarity despite the diversity of core promoter sequences in different species. The goal of our work is to find common characteristics of DNA region that define it as a promoter for the RNA polymerase II (Pol II).
resultsThe profiles of a large number of physical and structural characteristics, averaged over representative sets of the Pol II minimal core promoters of the evolutionary divergent species from animals, plants and unicellular fungi were analysed. In addition to the characteristics defined at the base-pair steps, we, for the first time, use profiles of the ultrasonic cleavage and DNase I cleavage indexes, informative for internal properties of each complementary strand.
conclusionsDNA of the core promoters of metazoans and Schizosaccharomyces pombe has similar structural organization. Its mechanical and 3D structural characteristics have singular properties at the positions of TATA-box. The minor groove is broadened and conformational motion is decreased in that region. Special characteristics of conformational behavior are revealed in metazoans at the region, which connects the end of TATA-box and the transcription start site (TSS). The intensities of conformational motions in the complementary strands are periodically changed in opposite phases. They are noticeable, best of all, in mammals. Such conformational features are lacking in the core promoters of S. pombe. The profiles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae core promoters significantly differ: their singular region is shifted down thus pointing to the uniqueness of their structural organization. Obtained results may be useful in genetic engineering for artificial modulation of the promoter strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.