Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27884016›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2017

Expression profiling of budding cells in colorectal cancer reveals an EMT-like phenotype and molecular subtype switching.

Linde De Smedt, Sofie Palmans, Daan Andel, Olivier Govaere, Bram Boeckx, Dominiek Smeets, Eva Galle, Jasper Wouters, David Barras, Madeleine Suffiotti and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Recommendations for reporting tumor budding in colorectal cancer based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2017
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Prospective Multicenter Study on the Prognostic and Predictive Impact of Tumor Budding in Stage II Colon Cancer: Results From the SACURA Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Clinical Challenges of Consensus Molecular Subtype CMS4 Colon Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Linde De SmedtTranslational Cell and Tissue Research Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sofie PalmansTranslational Cell and Tissue Research Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Daan AndelTranslational Cell and Tissue Research Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Olivier GovaereTranslational Cell and Tissue Research Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Bram BoeckxVesalius Research Center, Vlaams instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Leuven, Belgium.
Dominiek SmeetsVesalius Research Center, Vlaams instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Leuven, Belgium.
Eva GalleVesalius Research Center, Vlaams instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Leuven, Belgium.
Jasper WoutersTranslational Cell and Tissue Research Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
David BarrasBioinformatics Core Facility, Swiss Institute for Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Madeleine SuffiottiBioinformatics Core Facility, Swiss Institute for Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jeroen DekervelLaboratory of Hepatology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thomas TousseynTranslational Cell and Tissue Research Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Gert De HertoghTranslational Cell and Tissue Research Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hans PrenenDigestive Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sabine TejparDigestive Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Diether LambrechtsVesalius Research Center, Vlaams instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Leuven, Belgium.
Xavier SagaertTranslational Cell and Tissue Research Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumour budding, described as the presence of single cells or small clusters of up to five tumour cells at the invasive margin, is established as a prognostic marker in colorectal carcinoma. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the molecular signature of tumour budding cells and the corresponding tumour bulk.

methodsTumour bulk and budding areas were microdissected and processed for RNA-sequencing. As little RNA was obtained from budding cells, a special low-input mRNA library preparation protocol was used. Gene expression profiles of budding as compared with tumour bulk were investigated for established EMT signatures, consensus molecular subtype (CMS), gene set enrichment and pathway analysis.

resultsA total of 296 genes were differentially expressed with an FDR <0.05 and a twofold change between tumour bulk and budding regions. Genes that were upregulated in the budding signature were mainly involved in cell migration and survival while downregulated genes were important for cell proliferation. Supervised clustering according to an established EMT gene signature categorised budding regions as EMT-positive, whereas tumour bulk was considered EMT-negative. Furthermore, a shift from CMS2 (epithelial) to CMS4 (mesenchymal) was observed as tumour cells transit from the tumour bulk to the budding regions.

conclusionsTumour budding regions are characterised by a phenotype switch compared with the tumour bulk, involving the acquisition of migratory characteristics and a decrease in cell proliferation. In particular, most tumour budding signatures were EMT-positive and switched from an epithelial subtype (CMS2) in the tumour bulk to a mesenchymal subtype (CMS4) in budding cells.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell DivisionCell ProliferationColorectal NeoplasmsEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenes, SwitchHumansMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedNeoplasm Invasiveness

Identifiers

PMID27884016
PMCPMC5220148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.