Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27883018›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of food-borne nitriles in a liver in vitro model.

Franziska Kupke, Corinna Herz, Franziska S Hanschen, Stefanie Platz, Grace A Odongo, Simone Helmig, María M Bartolomé Rodríguez, Monika Schreiner, Sascha Rohn, Evelyn Lamy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biochemical characterization of twoFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  5. Synthesis of aACS omega · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Role of Sulfur Compounds in Vegetable and Mushroom Aroma.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Franziska KupkeUniversity of Hamburg, Hamburg School of Food Science, Institute of Food Chemistry, Grindelallee 117, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Corinna HerzUniversity of Freiburg-Medical Center, Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Molecular Preventive Medicine, Breisacher Strasse 115b, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Franziska S HanschenLeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops Grossbeeren/Erfurt e.V., Department of Plant Quality, Theodor-Echtermeyer-Weg 1, 14979 Grossbeeren, Germany.
Stefanie PlatzUniversity of Hamburg, Hamburg School of Food Science, Institute of Food Chemistry, Grindelallee 117, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Grace A OdongoUniversity of Hamburg, Hamburg School of Food Science, Institute of Food Chemistry, Grindelallee 117, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Simone HelmigJustus-Liebig University Giessen, Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational and Social Medicine and Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Aulweg 129, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
María M Bartolomé RodríguezClinic for Internal Medicine II, Molecular Biology, University of Freiburg-Medical Center, Hugstetter-Straße 55, 79106 Freiburg i.Br., Germany.
Monika SchreinerLeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops Grossbeeren/Erfurt e.V., Department of Plant Quality, Theodor-Echtermeyer-Weg 1, 14979 Grossbeeren, Germany.
Sascha RohnUniversity of Hamburg, Hamburg School of Food Science, Institute of Food Chemistry, Grindelallee 117, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Evelyn LamyUniversity of Freiburg-Medical Center, Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Molecular Preventive Medicine, Breisacher Strasse 115b, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
University Medical Center Freiburg · DELeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops · DEMSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Giessen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isothiocyanates are the most intensively studied breakdown products of glucosinolates from Brassica plants and well recognized for their pleiotropic effects against cancer but also for their genotoxic potential. However, knowledge about the bioactivity of glucosinolate-borne nitriles in foods is very poor. As determined by GC-MS, broccoli glucosinolates mainly degrade to nitriles as breakdown products. The cytotoxicity of nitriles in human HepG2 cells and primary murine hepatocytes was marginal as compared to isothiocyanates. Toxicity of nitriles was not enhanced in CYP2E1-overexpressing HepG2 cells. In contrast, the genotoxic potential of nitriles was found to be comparable to isothiocyanates. DNA damage was persistent over a certain time period and CYP2E1-overexpression further increased the genotoxic potential of the nitriles. Based on actual in vitro data, no indications are given that food-borne nitriles could be relevant for cancer prevention, but could pose a certain genotoxic risk under conditions relevant for food consumption.

Indexed as

FoodModels, BiologicalAnimalsBrassicaceaeCell DeathCell SurvivalCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedGlucosinolatesHepatocytesHep G2 CellsHumansIsothiocyanatesLiverMiceMutagensCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemGlucosinolatesIsothiocyanatesMutagensNitriles

Identifiers

PMID27883018
PMCPMC5121622
OpenAlexW2556729289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.