Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27882698›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology2017

The cellular and molecular basis of cnidarian neurogenesis.

Fabian Rentzsch, Michael Layden, Michaël Manuel

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. FromCells · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Microrna Expression inMicroRNA (Shariqah, United Arab Emirates) · 2026
    Article
  9. Diffuse pacemaker mechanism with distinctive organization drives pulsation in the octocoralProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Reduced Adult Neurogenesis in Humans Results From a Tradeoff Rather Than Direct Negative Selection.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A wound-induced differentiation trajectory for neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Larval swimming in the sea anemoneEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Fabian RentzschSars Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Michael LaydenLehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Michaël ManuelSorbonne Universités, UMPC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Evolution Paris-Seine, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine (IBPS), Paris, France.
Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine · FRLehigh University · USUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

Investigating pro-differentiation function of DeltaR03HD088961 · NICHD · LEHIGH UNIVERSITY · PI LAYDEN, MICHAEL JOHN · 2017 to 2018
$161k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD088961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurogenesis initiates during early development and it continues through later developmental stages and in adult animals to enable expansion, remodeling, and homeostasis of the nervous system. The generation of nerve cells has been analyzed in detail in few bilaterian model organisms, leaving open many questions about the evolution of this process. As the sister group to bilaterians, cnidarians occupy an informative phylogenetic position to address the early evolution of cellular and molecular aspects of neurogenesis and to understand common principles of neural development. Here we review studies in several cnidarian model systems that have revealed significant similarities and interesting differences compared to neurogenesis in bilaterian species, and between different cnidarian taxa. Cnidarian neurogenesis is currently best understood in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis, where it includes epithelial neural progenitor cells that express transcription factors of the soxB and atonal families. Notch signaling regulates the number of these neural progenitor cells, achaete-scute and dmrt genes are required for their further development and Wnt and BMP signaling appear to be involved in the patterning of the nervous system. In contrast to many vertebrates and Drosophila, cnidarians have a high capacity to generate neurons throughout their lifetime and during regeneration. Utilizing this feature of cnidarian biology will likely allow gaining new insights into the similarities and differences of embryonic and regenerative neurogenesis. The use of different cnidarian model systems and their expanding experimental toolkits will thus continue to provide a better understanding of evolutionary and developmental aspects of nervous system formation. WIREs Dev Biol 2017, 6:e257. doi: 10.1002/wdev.257 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Indexed as

AnimalsCnidariaNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisNeuronsSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID27882698
PMCPMC6680159
OpenAlexW2558199394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.