Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27882586›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of dermatology2017

Efficacy and safety of dose escalation of infliximab therapy in Japanese patients with psoriasis: Results of the SPREAD study.

Hideshi Torii, Masayuki Nakano, Toshiro Yano, Kazuoki Kondo, Hidemi Nakagawa, SPREAD Study Group

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of dermatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Impact of smoking on psoriasis risk and treatment efficacy: a meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hideshi ToriiDivision of Dermatology, Tokyo Yamate Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki NakanoSohyaku Innovative Research Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiro YanoIkuyaku Integrated Value Developmental Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuoki KondoSohyaku Innovative Research Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidemi NakagawaDepartment of Dermatology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
SPREAD Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although infliximab is approved for psoriasis, its efficacy is reduced over time in some patients. The aim of this phase III trial is to evaluate efficacy and safety of infliximab dose escalation in Japanese psoriasis patients with loss of efficacy to standard-dose therapy. Patients with plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, pustular psoriasis or psoriatic erythroderma who showed loss of efficacy to standard-dose therapy received infliximab dose escalation (10 mg/kg every 8 weeks) from weeks 0 to 32. Loss of efficacy was defined as not maintaining 50% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) after achieving PASI 75. Efficacy and safety were evaluated up to week 40. Fifty-one patients received dose escalation and 43 completed the study. PASI 75 and median improvement rate of PASI score at week 40 were 44% and 70.0%, respectively, showing efficacy in skin symptoms. Efficacies in quality of life, nail psoriasis and joint pain were also obtained. Median serum infliximab level increased from less than 0.1 to 1.1 μg/mL from weeks 0 to 40, showing positive correlation between efficacy and serum infliximab level at week 40. Favorable efficacy was observed in patients with detectable serum infliximab levels (≥0.1 μg/mL) at baseline. Incidences of adverse events, serious adverse events, serious infections and serious infusion reactions were 92%, 10%, 4% and 0%, respectively. No marked difference was observed in both efficacy and safety among psoriasis types. No new safety concerns were observed. Infliximab dose escalation was effective and well-tolerated in psoriasis patients with loss of efficacy to standard-dose therapy, suggesting that dose escalation may be a useful therapeutic option for these patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArthritis, PsoriaticDermatologic AgentsFemaleHumansInfliximabMaleMiddle AgedNail DiseasesPsoriasisQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeDermatologic AgentsInfliximabdose escalationefficacy and safetyinfliximabJapanesepsoriasis

Identifiers

PMID27882586
PMCPMC5434916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.