Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27882516›Full record

ReviewThe journal of headache and pain2016

Risk of medication overuse headache across classes of treatments for acute migraine.

Kristian Thorlund, Christina Sun-Edelstein, Eric Druyts, Steve Kanters, Shanil Ebrahim, Rahul Bhambri, Elodie Ramos, Edward J Mills, Michel Lanteri-Minet, Stewart Tepper

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of headache and pain, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Kristian ThorlundDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. kthorlund@redwoodoutcomes.com.
Christina Sun-EdelsteinDepartment of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Eric DruytsRedwood Outcomes, 302-1505 2nd Ave. West, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Steve KantersRedwood Outcomes, 302-1505 2nd Ave. West, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Shanil EbrahimDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Rahul BhambriPfizer Ltd, New York, NY, USA.
Elodie RamosPfizer Ltd, New York, NY, USA.
Edward J MillsDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Michel Lanteri-MinetPain Department, CHU Nice, France - FHU InovPain, Université Nice Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Stewart TepperGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
McMaster University · CAPfizer (United States) · USUniversity of British Columbia · CADartmouth College · USInserm · FRThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe most commonly prescribed medications used to treat migraine acutely are single analgesics, ergots, opioids, and triptans. Due to varying mechanisms of action across drug classes, there is reason to believe that some classes may be less likely than others to elicit Medication Overuse Headache (MOH) than others. We therefore aimed to determine whether certain classes of acute migraine drugs are more likely to elicit MOH than others.

methodsA comprehensive systematic literature was conducted to identify studies of varying designs that reported on MOH within the considered treatment classes. Only studies that reported MOH according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) were considered. Since no causal comparative design studies were identified; data from prevalence studies and surveys were retrieved. Prevalence-based relative risks between treatment classes were calculated by integrating both medication overuse and medication use from published studies. For each pair wise comparison, pooled relative risks were calculated as the inverse variance weighted average.

resultsA total of 29 studies informed the relative risk between treatment classes, all of which reported country-specific data. Five studies reported country-specific medication use data. For triptans versus analgesics the study relative risks generally favored triptans. The pooled relative risk was 0.65 (i.e., relative risk reduction of 35 %). For ergots versus analgesics, a similar trend was observed in favor of ergots with a relative risk of 0.41. For triptans versus ergots, the direction of effect was mixed, and the pooled relative risk was 1.07. Both triptans and ergots appeared favorable when compared to opioids, with pooled relative risks of 0.35 and 0.76, respectively. However, the evidence was limited for these comparisons. Analgesics and opioids also appeared to yield similar risk of MOH (pooled relative risk 1.09).

conclusionOur study suggests that in patients receiving acute migraine treatment, analgesics and opioids are associated with a higher risk of developing MOH compared with other treatments. These findings provide incentive for better monitoring of use of analgesics and opioids for treating acute migraine, and suggest possible clinical preference for use of so-called "migraine-specific" treatments, that is, triptans and ergots.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidErgotaminesHeadache Disorders, SecondaryHumansMigraine DisordersPrevalenceRiskRisk FactorsTryptaminesAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidErgotaminesTryptamines

Identifiers

PMID27882516
PMCPMC5121112
OpenAlexW2555521288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.