Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27882313›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2016

Experiences in Tick Control by Acaricide in the Traditional Cattle Sector in Zambia and Burkina Faso: Possible Environmental and Public Health Implications.

Daniele De Meneghi, Frédéric Stachurski, Hassane Adakal

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Advances in the use of entomopathogenic fungi to control ixodid ticks.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Molecular epidemiology ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A randomized controlled trial of Tickoff® (Parasite epidemiology and control · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Towards modelling tick-virus interactions using the weakly pathogenicFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Acaricidal Properties of Four Neem Seed Extracts (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Daniele De MeneghiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco-Turin, Italy; WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Veterinary Public Health, ISS-Rome, Rome, Italy; Animal Health Programme in the Republic of Zambia, Corridor Disease Control Unit, Veterinary Research Station, Mazabuka, Zambia.
Frédéric StachurskiCIRAD, UMR CMAEE, Montpellier, France; Unité URBIO, Centre International de Recherche-Développement sur l'Elevage en zone Subhumide (CIRDES), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Hassane AdakalDépartement des Sciences et Techniques de l'Elevage (DSTE/FASE), Université Dan Dicko Dankoulodo, Maradi, Niger; Unité URBIO, Centre International de Recherche-Développement sur l'Elevage en zone Subhumide (CIRDES), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Centre international de recherche-développement sur l'elevage en zone subhumide · BFUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Livestock, especially cattle, play a paramount role in agriculture production systems, particularly in poor countries throughout the world. Ticks and tick-borne diseases (TBDs) have an important impact on livestock and agriculture production in sub-Saharan Africa. The authors review the most common methods used for the control of ticks and TBDs. Special emphasis is given to the direct application of acaricides to the host animals. The possible environmental and public health adverse effects (i.e., risks for the workers, residues in the environment and in food products of animal origin) are mentioned. The authors present two case studies, describing different field experiences in controlling ticks in two African countries. In Zambia (Southern Africa), a strategic dipping regime was used to control

Indexed as

acaricidesenvironmental impactpublic healthtick control

Identifiers

PMID27882313
PMCPMC5101216
OpenAlexW2556059581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.