ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2016
Monozygotic twins with infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy: A case report and literature review.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy: Molecular mechanisms and pathogenesis of PLA2G6-associated neurodegeneration.AIMS neuroscience · 2025Review
- Infantile Neuroaxonal Dystrophy: Case Report and Review of Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Expression of Peripheral Blood DCs CD86, CD80, and Th1/Th2 in Sepsis Patients and Their Value on Survival Prediction.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Infantile Neuroaxonal Dystrophy in Two Cases: Siblings with Different Presentations.Iranian journal of child neurology · 2022Article
- Infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy caused by PLA2G6 gene mutation in a Chinese patient: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018Article
- PLA2G6-Associated Neurodegeneration (PLAN): Review of Clinical Phenotypes and Genotypes.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy (INAD) is a rare neurodegenerative disease with early onset. PLA2G6 gene mutations have been identified in the majority individuals with INAD. In future, molecular diagnosis of INAD will replace the invasive biopsies used previously. In the present report, monozygotic male twins with INAD were referred The Children's Hospital (Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang, China) at fifteen months old for delayed development. The older brother was found to have developmental stagnation when he was 6 months old. The patient could not stand securely without support, and had poor eye tracking and listening ability. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the patient's brain revealed cerebellar atrophy and electromyography identified signs of peripheral neuropathy. The younger brother displayed similar clinical features and findings. Two different phospholipase A2 group VI (PLA2G6; 22q13.1) gene mutations were detected in the twins by DNA sequencing. The results of the present study indicate that neurogenetic disease should be considered when child patients present with idiopathic developmental stagnation, particularly when similar cases have appeared in the same family. In addition, INAD should be considered as a possible diagnosis when the patient has developmental delay of the central and peripheral nerves. In the future, molecular genetic testing will be the primary method of INAD diagnosis, enabling better prevention of this genetic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.