ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016
Motor Cortex Neurostimulation Technologies for Chronic Post-stroke Pain: Implications of Tissue Damage on Stimulation Currents.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in central post-stroke pain: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Motor cortex stimulation: a systematic literature-based analysis of effectiveness and case series experience.BMC neurology · 2019Pooled it
- Methods of Computational Modelling in Studies of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Adults to Inform Protocols for Tinnitus Treatment: A Scoping Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Contributions of neuroimaging in central poststroke pain: a review.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2024Review
- Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for assessment of motor development in infants with early brain injury.Expert review of medical devices · 2024Article
- Exploring the Potential of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Relieving Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on language impairments in the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia.Brain communications · 2022Article
- Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Dejerine-Roussy Syndrome: a Comprehensive Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2020Review
- A safety study of 500 μA cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in rat.BMC neuroscience · 2019Article
- Diffusion Tensor Tractography Studies of Central Post-stroke Pain Due to the Spinothalamic Tract Injury: A Mini-Review.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Review
- Motor Cortex Stimulation for Deafferentation Pain.Current pain and headache reports · 2018Review
- Does non-invasive brain stimulation modify hand dexterity? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.