ArticleCirculation2017
Excess Cardiovascular Risk in Women Relative to Men Referred for Coronary Angiography Is Associated With Severely Impaired Coronary Flow Reserve, Not Obstructive Disease.
Article in Circulation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04475094 (Impact of Coronary Artery Stenting on Quantitative Myocardial Blood Flow and Health Status), which is not on this map. Cited by 149 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Coronary Artery Stenting on Quantitative Myocardial Blood Flow and Health Status
Who cites it
149 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 287 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Evaluation of non-invasive imaging parameters in coronary microvascular disease: a systematic review.BMC medical imaging · 2021Pooled it
- Update of the Brazilian Guideline on Nuclear Cardiology - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2020Guideline
- Coronary flow reserve in systemic rheumatic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Rheumatology international · 2018Pooled it
- Added value of myocardial blood flow usingJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Trial
- Effects of cardiac rehabilitation with and without meditation on myocardial blood flow using quantitative positron emission tomography: A pilot study.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Trial
- Genetic dysregulation of endothelin-1 is implicated in coronary microvascular dysfunction.European heart journal · 2020Trial
- Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Is Associated With Myocardial Ischemia and Abnormal Coronary Perfusion During Exercise.Circulation · 2019Trial
- Sex Differences in Coronary Microvascular Function in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes · 2019Trial
- Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Acutely Improves Coronary Microcirculatory Function.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Trial
- Sex Differences in Clinical Characteristics, Psychosocial Factors, and Outcomes Among Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease: Insights from the STABILITY (Stabilization of Atherosclerotic Plaque by Initiation of Darapladib Therapy) Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Trial
- Reduced ¹³N-Ammonia PET Myocardial Flow Reserve and Heart-Failure-Related Risk Independent of Relative Ischemia in Chronic Coronary Syndrome.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Contemporary Challenges and Strategies for Diagnosing and Managing in Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Inflammation-based phenotyping and prognostic implications in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- A sex-specific perspective on coronary microvascular dysfunction in HFpEF: from vascular to myocardial disease.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Coronary Flow Reserve in Adults: Pathophysiology, Assessment Modalities, Clinical Applications, and Prognostic Significance.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Abnormal myocardial perfusion reserve and myocardial infarction determine cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2026Article
- Article
- Coronary artery surgery outcome differences by sex.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Review
- Refractory angina: mechanisms and stratified treatment in obstructive and non-obstructive chronic myocardial ischaemic syndromes.European heart journal · 2025Review
89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) fatality rates are higher for women than for men, yet obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is less prevalent in women. Coronary flow reserve (CFR), an integrated measure of large- and small-vessel CAD and myocardial ischemia, identifies patients at risk for CVD death, but is not routinely measured in clinical practice. We sought to investigate the impact of sex, CFR, and angiographic CAD severity on adverse cardiovascular events.
methodsConsecutive patients (n=329, 43% women) referred for invasive coronary angiography after stress testing with myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography and with left ventricular ejection fraction >40% were followed (median, 3.0 years) for a composite end point of major adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular death and hospitalization for nonfatal myocardial infarction or heart failure. The extent and severity of angiographic CAD were estimated by using the CAD prognostic index, and CFR was quantified by using positron emission tomography.
resultsAlthough women in comparison with men had lower pretest clinical scores, rates of prior myocardial infarction, and burden of angiographic CAD (P<0.001), they demonstrated greater risk of CVD events, even after adjustment for traditional risk factors, imaging findings, and early revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-4.02; P=0.03). Impaired CFR was similarly present among women and men, but in patients with low CFR (<1.6, n=163), women showed a higher frequency of nonobstructive CAD, whereas men showed a higher frequency of severely obstructive CAD (P=0.002). After also adjusting for CFR, the effect of sex on outcomes was no longer significant. When stratified by sex and CFR, only women with severely impaired CFR demonstrated significantly increased adjusted risk of CVD events (P<0.0001, P for interaction=0.04).
conclusionsWomen referred for coronary angiography had a significantly lower burden of obstructive CAD in comparison with men but were not protected from CVD events. Excess cardiovascular risk in women was independently associated with impaired CFR, representing a hidden biological risk, and a phenotype less amenable to revascularization. Impaired CFR, particularly absent severely obstructive CAD, may represent a novel target for CVD risk reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.