Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27881527›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2016

Clinical factors associated with initiation of and persistence with ADP receptor-inhibiting oral antiplatelet treatment after acute coronary syndrome: a nationwide cohort study from Finland.

Tuire Prami, Houssem Khanfir, Anna Deleskog, Pål Hasvold, Ville Kytö, Eeva Reissell, Juhani Airaksinen

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evidence-practice gaps in P2YInternal medicine journal · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tuire PramiEPID Research, Espoo, Finland.
Houssem KhanfirEPID Research, Espoo, Finland.
Anna DeleskogAstraZeneca Nordic-Baltic, Södertälje, Sweden.
Pål HasvoldAstraZeneca Nordic-Baltic, Södertälje, Sweden.
Ville KytöHeart Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Eeva ReissellNational Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Juhani AiraksinenHeart Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
AstraZeneca (Sweden) · SEFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FITurku University Hospital · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo study patient selection for and persistence with ADP receptor-inhibiting oral antiplatelet (OAP) treatment after acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

designObservational, retrospective, cohort study linking real-life patient-level register data.

settingNationwide drug usage study using data of patients with ACS discharged from hospitals in Finland.

participantsThe study population consisted of 54 416 patients (aged ≥18 years) following hospital admission for unstable angina pectoris or myocardial infarction during 2009-2013. Patients were classified as either OAP or non-OAP users based on drug purchases within 7 days of discharge. OUTCOME MEASURES: Initiation of and a 12-month persistence with OAP medication.

resultsIn total, 49% of patients with ACS received OAP treatment after hospital discharge. Women represented 40% of the population, but only 32% of them became OAP users (adjusted OR for initiation compared with men 0.8; p<0.001). Patients not treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), elderly and patients with dementia/Alzheimer's disease, atrial fibrillation or warfarin treatment were less likely to be treated with OAP. If initiated, they were less likely to complete the recommended 12 months' medication (adjusted risk increment >38% and p<0.001 for all). The OAP users showed good compliance with immediate initiation (92% within 1 day of discharge) and high mean medication possession rate (99%). Among OAP users, the usage of other secondary prevention drugs after ACS was more common than in non-OAP-treated patients (difference >20 percentage points for each).

conclusionsOnly half of the patients with ACS received guideline-recommended ADP receptor-inhibiting OAP treatment after hospital discharge, suggesting suboptimal treatment practices. Non-PCI-treated patients and patients with increased age, unstable angina, dementia or atrial fibrillation appear to have the highest risk of deficient treatment with OAPs. OAP users, however, showed good compliance during drug usage.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedAged, 80 and overAngina PectorisFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPatient SelectionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsRetrospective StudiesPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPurinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonistsdrug utilizationoral antiplateletpersistenceunstable angina pectoris

Identifiers

PMID27881527
PMCPMC5129076
OpenAlexW2551513343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.