Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27881518›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of brief, habit-based, lifestyle advice for cancer survivors: exploring behavioural outcomes for the Advancing Survivorship Cancer Outcomes Trial (ASCOT).

Rebecca J Beeken, Helen Croker, Maggie Heinrich, Lee Smith, Kate Williams, Allan Hackshaw, John Hines, Michael Machesney, Madhavan Krishnaswamy, Sharon Cavanagh and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Exploring the perceived impact of social support on the health behaviours of people living with and beyond cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The health behaviour status of teenage and young adult cancer patients and survivors in the United Kingdom.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Rebecca J BeekenDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
Helen CrokerDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
Maggie HeinrichDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
Lee SmithDepartment of Life Sciences, The Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Kate WilliamsDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
Allan HackshawThe Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, UK.
John HinesBarts Health NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
Michael MachesneyBarts Health NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
Madhavan KrishnaswamySouthend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Westcliff-on-Sea, UK.
Sharon CavanaghLondon Cancer, London, UK.
Rebecca RoylanceUCLH Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Alison HillUCLH Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kathy Pritchard-JonesLondon Cancer, London, UK.
Jane WardleDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
Abigail FisherDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK C1418/A141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPositive health behaviours such as regular physical activity and a healthy diet have significant effects on cancer outcomes. There is a need for simple but effective behaviour change interventions with the potential to be implemented within the cancer care pathway. Habit-based advice encourages repetition of a behaviour in a consistent context so that the behaviour becomes increasingly automatic in response to a specific contextual cue. This approach therefore encourages long-term behaviour change and can be delivered through printed materials. 'Healthy Habits for Life' is a brief intervention based on habit theory, and incorporating printed materials plus a personally tailored discussion, that has been designed specifically for patients with a diagnosis of cancer. The aim of this trial was to test the effect of 'Healthy Habits for Life' on a composite health behaviour risk index (CHBRI) over 3 months in patients with a diagnosis of breast, colorectal or prostate cancer. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: A 2-arm, individually randomised controlled trial in patients with breast, colorectal and prostate cancer. Patients will be recruited over 18 months from 7 National Health Service Trusts in London and Essex. Following baseline assessments and allocation to intervention or usual care, patients are followed up at 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome will be change in CHBRI at 3 months. Maintenance of any changes over 6 months, and changes in individual health behaviours (including dietary intake, physical activity, alcohol consumption and smoking status) will also be explored. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained through the National Research Ethics Service Committee South Central-Oxford B via the Integrated Research Application System (reference number 14/SC/1369). Results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 17421871.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorLife StyleBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHealth StatusHumansLinear ModelsMaleProstatic NeoplasmsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuality of LifeResearch DesignSelf ReportUnited KingdomBEHAVIOUR CHANGECANCERHABITSINTERVENTIONSURVIVOR

Identifiers

PMID27881518
PMCPMC5178807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.