Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27881426›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2016

Contemporary Trends and Age-Specific Sex Differences in Management and Outcome for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Leonardo De Luca, Marco Marini, Lucio Gonzini, Alessandro Boccanelli, Gianni Casella, Francesco Chiarella, Stefano De Servi, Antonio Di Chiara, Giuseppe Di Pasquale, Zoran Olivari and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Leonardo De LucaDivision of Cardiology, San Giovanni Evangelista Hospital, Tivoli (Rome), Italy.
Marco MariniDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.
Lucio GonziniANMCO Research Center, Florence, Italy.
Alessandro BoccanelliDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, S. Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Gianni CasellaDepartment of Cardiology, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Francesco ChiarellaDivision of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria S. Martino, Genova, Italy.
Stefano De ServiDivision of Cardiology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Antonio Di ChiaraDivision of Cardiology, Ospedale Sant'Antonio Abate, Tolmezzo, Italy.
Giuseppe Di PasqualeDepartment of Cardiology, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Zoran OlivariDepartment of Cardiology, Ca' Foncello Hospital, Treviso, Italy.
Giorgio CarettaDivision of Cardiology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, ASL 5 Liguria, La Spezia, Italy.
Laura LenattiDivision of Cardiology, Ospedale A. Manzoni, Lecco, Italy.
Michele Massimo GuliziaDivision of Cardiology, Garibaldi-Nesima Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Stefano SavonittoDivision of Cardiology, Ospedale A. Manzoni, Lecco, Italy centrostudi@anmco.it s.savonitto@asst-lecco.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAge- and sex-specific differences exist in the treatment and outcome of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to describe age- and sex-matched contemporary trends of in-hospital management and outcome of patients with STEMI. METHODS AND

resultsWe analyzed data from 5 Italian nationwide prospective registries, conducted between 2001 and 2014, including consecutive patients with STEMI. All the analyses were age- and sex-matched, considering 4 age classes: <55, 55 to 64, 65 to 74, and ≥75 years. A total of 13 235 patients were classified as having STEMI (72.1% men and 27.9% women). A progressive shift from thrombolysis to primary percutaneous coronary intervention occurred over time, with a concomitant increase in overall reperfusion rates (P for trend <0.0001), which was consistent across sex and age classes. The crude rates of in-hospital death were 3.2% in men and 8.4% in women (P<0.0001), with a significant increase over age classes for both sexes and a significant decrease over time for both sexes (all P for trend <0.01). On multivariable analysis, age (odds ratio 1.09, 95% CI 1.07-1.10, P<0.0001) and female sex (odds ratio 1.44, 95% CI 1.07-1.93, P=0.009) were found to be significantly associated with in-hospital mortality after adjustment for other risk factors, but no significant interaction between these 2 variables was observed (P for interaction=0.61).

conclusionsDespite a nationwide shift from thrombolytic therapy to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI affecting both sexes and all ages, women continue to experience higher in-hospital mortality than men, irrespective of age.

Indexed as

RegistriesRisk AssessmentAgedAge FactorsElectrocardiographyFemaleHospital MortalityHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSex Factorspercutaneous coronary interventionregistrysexST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID27881426
PMCPMC5210417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.