ArticleBMC neurology2016
A step toward essential tremor gene discovery: identification of extreme phenotype and screening of HTRA2 and ANO3.
Article in BMC neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiology of Pediatric Essential Tremor in the United States: A Systematic Literature Review from 2010 to 2020.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Pooled it
- Review
- Genomic Markers for Essential Tremor.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEssential tremor (ET) is characterized by a frequent family history. No monogenic form of ET has been identified. We aimed at exploring ET patients to identify distinct subgroups and facilitate the identification of ET genes. We tested for the presence of HTRA2 p.G399S, and ANO3 p. W490C, p. R484 W and p. S685G mutations.
methodsBetween June 2011 and November 2013, all consecutive patients suspected with ET were prospectively included in a prospective, monocentric study. Family history, age at onset (AAO), features of tremor, benefit of alcohol and drugs, electrophysiological recording findings were collected. Sanger sequencing was performed for HTRA2 and ANO3 mutations screening.
resultsSixty eight patients were investigated. Fourteen diagnosed with psychogenic (5) or dystonic tremor (9) were excluded. Regarding the 54 ET patients, mean AAO was 48 years (6-77), and mean disease duration 15 years (1-55). Bimodal distribution of AAO was consistent with phenotypic subgroups. In patients with AAO before 30 years, marked benefit of alcohol (p < 0.01) and ET family history (p < 0.01) were more frequent and the disease progression less severe (p < 0.0001). Neither HTRA2 nor ANO3 mutation were identified in our patients.
conclusionsOur data support that distinct ET phenotypic subgroups may be encountered. We recommend to study separately extreme phenotypes of ET, particularly autosomal dominant families with early AAO (<30 years) and marked benefit of alcohol, to facilitate the identification of ET genes. Electromyographic recording remains a support to distinguish ET from differential diagnosis. HTRA2 and ANO3 mutations are not common causes of ET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.