Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27881082›Full record

Trial reportBMC infectious diseases2016

Quality assurance of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in the implementation of HPV primary screening in Norway: an inter-laboratory reproducibility study.

Birgit Engesæter, Bianca van Diermen Hidle, Mona Hansen, Pia Moltu, Kjersti Mangseth Staby, Siri Borchgrevink-Persen, Olav K Vintermyr, Stefan Lönnberg, Mari Nygård, Emiel A M Janssen and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Randomized Implementation of a Primary Human Papillomavirus Testing-based Cervical Cancer Screening Protocol for Women 34 to 69 Years in Norway.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Trial
  2. Performance and acceptability of self-collected human papillomavirus testing among women living with HIV.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quality assurance in human papillomavirus testing for primary cervical screening.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Birgit EngesæterCancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Bianca van Diermen HidleDepartment of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Mona HansenDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Pia MoltuDepartment of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Kjersti Mangseth StabyDepartment of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Siri Borchgrevink-PersenDepartment of Pathology and Medical Genetics, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Olav K VintermyrDepartment of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Stefan LönnbergCancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Mari NygårdCancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Emiel A M JanssenDepartment of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Philip E CastleAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Irene Kraus ChristiansenDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway. irene.kraus.christiansen@ahus.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) testing as primary screening for cervical cancer is currently being implemented in Norway in a randomized controlled fashion, involving three laboratories. As part of the quality assurance programme of the implementation, an evaluation of the inter-laboratory reproducibility of the HPV test was initiated, to ensure satisfactory HPV test reliability in all three laboratories.

methodsThe HPV test used is the cobas 4800 HPV Test, detecting 14 high-risk types with individual HPV genotype results for HPV16 and HPV18. In addition to the three laboratories involved in the implementation, the Norwegian HPV reference laboratory was included as a fourth comparative laboratory. A stratified sample of 500 cervical liquid based cytology (LBC) samples was used in the evaluation, with an aim towards a high-risk HPV positivity of ~25%. Samples were collected at one laboratory, anonymized, aliquoted, and distributed to the other laboratories.

resultsComparison of the test results of all four laboratories revealed a 95.6% agreement, an 86.3% positive agreement and a kappa value of 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.97). For negative cytology specimens, there was a 95.8% overall agreement, a 67.4% positive agreement, and a kappa value of 0.88 (95% CI 0.80-0.93). For abnormal cytology specimens, there was a 95.8% overall agreement, a 95.5% positive agreement, and a kappa value of 0.86 (95% CI 0.71-0.97).

conclusionsThe study showed a high inter-laboratory reproducibility of HPV testing, implying satisfactory user performance and reliability in the laboratories involved in the implementation project. This is important knowledge and we recommend similar studies always to be performed prior to the introduction of new screening routines.

Indexed as

Quality Assurance, Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNorwayPapillomavirus InfectionsReproducibility of ResultsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultCervical cancer screeningCobas 4800 HPV TestHPVHPV primary screeningHPV testingHuman papillomavirusInter-laboratory reproducibilityQuality assurance

Identifiers

PMID27881082
PMCPMC5122146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.