Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27881081›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Phylogenetic distribution of plant snoRNA families.

Deblina Patra Bhattacharya, Sebastian Canzler, Stephanie Kehr, Jana Hertel, Ivo Grosse, Peter F Stadler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RNA regulation in plants.Science China. Life sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Grafting based DNA methylation alteration of snoRNAs in upland cotton (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The Existence and Localization of Nuclear snoRNAs inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Deblina Patra BhattacharyaBioinformatics Group, Dept. Computer Science, and artin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Leipzig, D-04107, Germany.
Sebastian CanzlerBioinformatics Group, Dept. Computer Science, and artin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Leipzig, D-04107, Germany.
Stephanie KehrBioinformatics Group, Dept. Computer Science, and artin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Leipzig, D-04107, Germany.
Jana HertelYoung Investigators Group Bioinformatics & Transcriptomics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Permoserstrasse 15, Leipzig, D-04318, Germany.
Ivo GrosseInstitut für Informatik, Halle (Saale), D-06120, Germany.
Peter F StadlerBioinformatics Group, Dept. Computer Science, and artin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Leipzig, D-04107, Germany. studla@bioinf.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5016-5191
Halle Institute for Economic Research · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are one of the most ancient families amongst non-protein-coding RNAs. They are ubiquitous in Archaea and Eukarya but absent in bacteria. Their main function is to target chemical modifications of ribosomal RNAs. They fall into two classes, box C/D snoRNAs and box H/ACA snoRNAs, which are clearly distinguished by conserved sequence motifs and the type of chemical modification that they govern. Similarly to microRNAs, snoRNAs appear in distinct families of homologs that affect homologous targets. In animals, snoRNAs and their evolution have been studied in much detail. In plants, however, their evolution has attracted comparably little attention.

resultsIn order to chart the phylogenetic distribution of individual snoRNA families in plants, we applied a sophisticated approach for identifying homologs of known plant snoRNAs across the plant kingdom. In response to the relatively fast evolution of snoRNAs, information on conserved sequence boxes, target sequences, and secondary structure is combined to identify additional snoRNAs. We identified 296 families of snoRNAs in 24 species and traced their evolution throughout the plant kingdom. Many of the plant snoRNA families comprise paralogs. We also found that targets are well-conserved for most snoRNA families.

conclusionsThe sequence conservation of snoRNAs is sufficient to establish homologies between phyla. The degree of this conservation tapers off, however, between land plants and algae. Plant snoRNAs are frequently organized in highly conserved spatial clusters. As a resource for further investigations we provide carefully curated and annotated alignments for each snoRNA family under investigation.

Indexed as

Multigene FamilyPhylogenyBase SequenceCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyConserved SequenceDatabases, Nucleic AcidEvolution, MolecularPlantsRNA, PlantRNA, Small NucleolarRNA, PlantRNA, Small NucleolarEvolutionSmall RNAssnoRNAssnoRNA targets

Identifiers

PMID27881081
PMCPMC5122169
OpenAlexW2549578439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.