Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27880811›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

Oral Ondansetron versus Domperidone for Acute Gastroenteritis in Pediatric Emergency Departments: Multicenter Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Federico Marchetti, Maurizio Bonati, Alessandra Maestro, Davide Zanon, Francesca Rovere, Alberto Arrighini, Egidio Barbi, Paolo Bertolani, Paolo Biban, Liviana Da Dalt and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Child with Vomiting.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 16 institutions in 2 countries.

Federico MarchettiDepartment of Pediatrics, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.
Maurizio BonatiLaboratory for Mother and Child Health, Department of Public Health, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milano, Italy.
Alessandra MaestroPharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.
Davide ZanonPharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.
Francesca RoverePharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.
Alberto ArrighiniPediatric Emergency Department, Presidio Ospedale dei Bambini, A.O. Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Egidio BarbiPediatric Emergency Department, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.
Paolo BertolaniPediatric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Paolo BibanPediatric Emergency Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Liviana Da DaltDepartment of Pediatrics, Treviso Hospital, Treviso, Italy.
Andrea GualaDepartment of Pediatrics, Ospedale Castelli, Verbania, Italy.
Elisa MazzoniDepartment of Pediatrics, Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy.
Anna PazzagliaEmergency Department, Pediatric Hospital A. Meyer, Firenze, Italy.
Paolo Francesco PerriDepartment of Pediatrics, Ospedale di Macerata, Macerata, Italy.
Antonino RealeEmergency Department, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Salvatore RennaEmergency Room and Emergency Medicine Division, G. Gaslini Institute, Genova, Italy.
Antonio Francesco UrbinoEmergency Department, Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita, Torino, Italy.
Enrico VallettaDepartment of Pediatrics, Ospedale G.B. Morgagni - L. Pierantoni, Forlì, Italy.
Antonio VitaleDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Emergency, "San Giuseppe Moscati" National Hospital (AORN), Avellino, Italy.
Tiziana ZangardiPediatric Emergency Department, Azienda Ospedaliera - University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Antonio ClavennaLaboratory for Mother and Child Health, Department of Public Health, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milano, Italy.
Luca RonfaniClinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5710-3914
SONDO (Study ONdansetron vs DOmperidone) Investigators
IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo · ITMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITAzienda Ospedale - Università Padova · ITAzienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITCa' Foncello Hospital · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITHumanitas Castelli · ITIstituto Giannina Gaslini · ITMeyer Children's Hospital · ITOspedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi · ITOspedale di MacerataOspedale G.B. Morgagni - L.Pierantoni · ITOspedale Regina Margherita · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of antiemetics for vomiting in acute gastroenteritis in children is still a matter of debate. We conducted a double-blind randomized trial to evaluate whether a single oral dose of ondansetron vs domperidone or placebo improves outcomes in children with gastroenteritis. After failure of initial oral rehydration administration, children aged 1-6 years admitted for gastroenteritis to the pediatric emergency departments of 15 hospitals in Italy were randomized to receive one oral dose of ondansetron (0.15 mg/kg) or domperidone (0.5 mg/kg) or placebo. The primary outcome was the percentage of children receiving nasogastric or intravenous rehydration. A p value of 0.014 was used to indicate statistical significance (and 98.6% CI were calculated) as a result of having carried out two interim analyses. 1,313 children were eligible for the first attempt with oral rehydration solution, which was successful for 832 (63.4%); 356 underwent randomization (the parents of 125 children did not give consent): 118 to placebo, 119 to domperidone, and 119 to ondansetron. Fourteen (11.8%) needed intravenous rehydration in the ondansetron group vs 30 (25.2%) and 34 (28.8%) in the domperidone and placebo groups, respectively. Ondansetron reduced the risk of intravenous rehydration by over 50%, both vs placebo (RR 0.41, 98.6% CI 0.20-0.83) and domperidone (RR 0.47, 98.6% CI 0.23-0.97). No differences for adverse events were seen among groups. In a context of emergency care, 6 out of 10 children aged 1-6 years with vomiting due to gastroenteritis and without severe dehydration can be managed effectively with administration of oral rehydration solution alone. In children who fail oral rehydration, a single oral dose of ondansetron reduces the need for intravenous rehydration and the percentage of children who continue to vomit, thereby facilitating the success of oral rehydration. Domperidone was not effective for the symptomatic treatment of vomiting during acute gastroenteritis.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdministration, OralAntiemeticsChildChild, PreschoolDomperidoneDouble-Blind MethodEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleGastroenteritisHumansInfantMaleOndansetronPlacebo EffectAntiemeticsDomperidoneOndansetron

Identifiers

PMID27880811
PMCPMC5120790
OpenAlexW2553337169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.