Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27879659›Full record

ReviewMarine drugs2016

Innovative Alternative Technologies to Extract Carotenoids from Microalgae and Seaweeds.

Mahesha M Poojary, Francisco J Barba, Bahar Aliakbarian, Francesco Donsì, Gianpiero Pataro, Daniel A Dias, Pablo Juliano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Marine drugs, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mahesha M PoojaryDiscipline of Laboratory Medicine, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, 3083 Bundoora, Australia. mahesha.poojary@unicam.it.
Francisco J BarbaNutrition and Food Science Area, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Food Sciences, Toxicology and Forensic Medicine Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitat de València, Avda. Vicent Andrés Estellés, s/n, 46100 Burjassot, València, Spain. francisco.barba@uv.es.
Bahar AliakbarianDepartment of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Pole of Chemical Engineering, University of Genoa, via Opera Pia 15, 16145 Genoa, Italy. Bahar.Aliakbarian@unige.it.
Francesco DonsìDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy. fdonsi@unisa.it.
Gianpiero PataroDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy. gpataro@unisa.it.
Daniel A DiasDiscipline of Laboratory Medicine, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, 3083 Bundoora, Australia. daniel.dias@rmit.edu.au.
Pablo JulianoCSIRO Agriculture and Food, 671 Sneydes Road, 3030 Werribee, VIC, Australia. Pablo.Juliano@csiro.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine microalgae and seaweeds (microalgae) represent a sustainable source of various bioactive natural carotenoids, including β-carotene, lutein, astaxanthin, zeaxanthin, violaxanthin and fucoxanthin. Recently, the large-scale production of carotenoids from algal sources has gained significant interest with respect to commercial and industrial applications for health, nutrition, and cosmetic applications. Although conventional processing technologies, based on solvent extraction, offer a simple approach to isolating carotenoids, they suffer several, inherent limitations, including low efficiency (extraction yield), selectivity (purity), high solvent consumption, and long treatment times, which have led to advancements in the search for innovative extraction technologies. This comprehensive review summarizes the recent trends in the extraction of carotenoids from microalgae and seaweeds through the assistance of different innovative techniques, such as pulsed electric fields, liquid pressurization, supercritical fluids, subcritical fluids, microwaves, ultrasounds, and high-pressure homogenization. In particular, the review critically analyzes technologies, characteristics, advantages, and shortcomings of the different innovative processes, highlighting the differences in terms of yield, selectivity, and economic and environmental sustainability.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyCarotenoidsChromatography, Supercritical FluidHumansMicroalgaeMicrowavesSeaweedSolventsCarotenoidsSolventscarotenoidselectrotechnologiesgreen processingmarine drugsmarine microalgaemicrowave-assisted extractionnonconventional extractionpulsed electric field-assisted extractionseaweedssupercritical fluid extraction

Identifiers

PMID27879659
PMCPMC5128757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.